Frustrative Nonreward and the Basal Ganglia: Chemogenetic Inhibition and Excitation of the Nucleus Accumbens and Globus Pallidus Externus During Reward Downshift

Sara Guarino,Christopher Hagen,Quynh Nguyen,Mauricio R. Papini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4063821
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Frustrative nonreward induced by consummatory reward downshift (cRD) contributes to anxiety disorders and addiction, as signaled by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative. These experiments explored the role of the basal ganglia in cRD using inhibitory and excitatory DREADDs (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs) infused in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and globus pallidus externus (GPe). Experiment 1 showed that 32-to-2% and 8-to-2% sucrose downshifts used in subsequent DREADD experiments resulted in significant consummatory suppression, with the larger reward disparity inducing greater suppression than the smaller reward disparity. NAc inhibition did not disrupt consummatory suppression during a 32-to-2% (Experiment 2a) or 8-to-2% sucrose downshift (Experiment 2b). However, NAc excitation increased consummatory suppression during a 32-to-2% sucrose downshifts (Experiment 2a). GPe inhibition increased licking suppression after a 32-to-2% sucrose downshift, whereas GPe excitation eliminated licking suppression after an 8-to-2% sucrose downshift (Experiment 3). Chemogenetic manipulations of NAc and GPe had no detectable effects on open field activity. In each case, the effects of DREADD activation via clozapine N-oxide administration were compared to controls that carried the DREADDs, but received vehicle injections, and to virus vector controls. c-Fos expression profiles in each of the experiments detected increased activity in NAc and GPe neurons after excitatory DREADD activation, but no changes after inhibitory DREADD activation. NAc and GPe excitation led to opposite results in the cRD task, providing the first evidence suggesting a role for the BG circuit in frustrative nonreward in the absence of motor effects.Funding Information: This research was partially funded by TCU/SERC grants G-180614 (SG), G200408 (SG), G200409 (CH), UG-180534 (QN), UG200736 (QN), and UG190630 and UG190630 (to A. DeMarco); Psi Chi grant 23728PS (QN, MRP); and by grants from the TCU Honors College (QN). Declaration of Interests: None. Ethics Approval Statement: The research reported in this article was carried out with IACUC approval in a USDA-inspected facility.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?