Stabilities and transfer activity coefficients from water to polar nonaqueous solvents of 1,2-bis[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzene- and benzo-18-crown-6-cation complexes

Yasuyuki Takeda,Munehiro Tanaka,Shoichi Katsuta,Naoaki Fukada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958970512331334287

2005-03-10

Journal of Coordination Chemistry

Abstract:Formation constants (K ML) for 1:1 complexes of 1,2-bis[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzene (AC·B18C6), a linear counterpart of benzo-18-crown-6 (B18C6), and B18C6 with various mono- and divalent cations were determined in water at 25°C by conductometry; the K ML value for the B18C6-Li+ complex was also determined in acetonitrile. By using the K ML and literature values, transfer activity coefficients of the AC·B18C6- and B18C6-alkali metal ion complexes from water to polar nonaqueous solvents were calculated. The selectivity order in water of AC·B18C6 for univalent cations is different from that of B18C6, but for bivalent cations they are almost the same. For the same cation, the aqueous log K ML value is lower for AC·B18C6 than for B18C6 except for size-misfitting smaller cations (H+, Li+, Cd2+). In general, cyclization of the two binding-arms of AC·B18C6 increases the selectivity and stability for the cations in water. Although AC·B18C6 is always less hydrophilic than B18C6, the AC·B18C6-alkali metal ion complex is more hydrophilic than the corresponding B18C6 complex. It follows that the alkali metal ion in the AC·B18C6 complex is less effectively shielded and dehydration of AC·B18C6 upon complexation in water is less efficient, compared with B18C6. Hydrogen bonding between AC·B18C6 or B18C6 and water causes the unexpectedly lowest aqueous stability of the AC·B18C6- or B18C6-alkali metal ion complex among all the solvents. The same holds for the stabilities of the other metal ion complexes with AC·B18C6 or B18C6.

chemistry, inorganic & nuclear