Abstract:Fear of crime has been researched since late 1960s and is commonly recognized one of the most frequent issue investigated in contemporary criminology. Definition of the fear of crime, its operability by means of particular investigation methods and techniques, and its macro-, meso-, and micro-social conditioning factors are widely discussed in the scientific literature on the subject. This article describes methodological aspects of research on this issue and particular questionnaire questions formulated in such research. The most frequent method used in research on fear of crime is to use particular questionnaire questions asked to respondents on quantitative surveys. There are attempts to use other research methods and techniques such as in-depth and focus interviews or content analysis. Among qualitative research, there are two predominant methods of fear measurement and, what follows, its definition and analysis. The first assumes a single question (e.g. how safe one feels on a lonely evening walk) with closed categories of responses. Choosing a category by the respondent is deemed to be an indicator of fear. The second method assumes that fear of crime is a continuous quantitative variable created by a scale which sums up responses to a series of questions on particular aspects of fear (e.g. fear of various types of crimes). The results obtained by the first method are presented as a percentage of respondents afraid of becoming a victim of crime which percentage is to reflect fear of crime level in a society. A relationship with other variables within to-dimensional analyses (e.g. using cross-tables) and multidimensional (e.g. with the use of logistic regression) are also investigated. Presenting one-dimensional results from the second method of measurement is much less understandable since it relies on an abstract arithmetic mean which is impossible to interpret. At the same time, however, they enable to define the level of fear (and not only the sole fact of its occurrence or lack of occurrence) and to use more precise techniques of two- and multi-dimensional analysis such as comparison of means and linear regression. It is worth to not that precise determination of the number, form and way of asking such questions is subject to constant debate in the literature which has not been decided so far.

The ‘young and the fearless’: revisiting the conceptualisation of fear of crime

Validating New Measures of the Fear of Crime

Adolescent fear of crime: Testing Ferraro’s risk interpretation model

A psychological perspective on vulnerability in the fear of crime

Influence of environmental variables on fear of crime: Comparing self-report data with physiological measures in an experimental design

Introducing Fear of Crime to Risk Research

Defining and Measuring Fear of Crime: A New Validated Scale Created from Emotion Theory, Qualitative Interviews, and Factor Analyses

Tehtanje strahu pred kriminaliteto

Psychological distance and fear of crime: Towards a new understanding of risk perception formation

Fear of crime in Brisbane city: revisiting the importance of ‘context’ in the development of fear of crime

Developing a model of perceptions of security and insecurity in the context of crime

Modelling the fear of crime

The Interplay between Fear Reactivity and Callous–Unemotional Traits Predicting Reactive and Proactive Aggression

The Measurement of Fear of Crime

A Social-Psychological Process of “Fear of Crime” for Men and Women: Revisiting Gender Differences from a New Perspective

The Limits of Vulnerability in Explaining Fear of Crime: A Comparative Neighborhood Analysis

Examining experiential fear of crime using STUNDA: Findings from a smartphone-based experience methods study

Night After Night, My Heartbeat Shows the Fear: Examining Predictors of Fear of Crime in the Nonurban Australian Context

The role of collective efficacy in shaping behavioral responses to fear of crime

Jak badać lęk przed przestępczością?

On the relationship between criminal victimization and fear of crime