Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM2.5 and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales

Erin E. McDuffie,Randall V. Martin,Joseph V. Spadaro,Richard Burnett,Steven J. Smith,Patrick O’Rourke,Melanie S. Hammer,Aaron van Donkelaar,Liam Bindle,Viral Shah,Lyatt Jaeglé,Gan Luo,Fangqun Yu,Jamiu A. Adeniran,Jintai Lin,Michael Brauer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23853-y
IF: 16.6
2021-06-14
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Ambient fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is the world’s leading environmental health risk factor. Reducing the PM 2.5 disease burden requires specific strategies that target dominant sources across multiple spatial scales. We provide a contemporary and comprehensive evaluation of sector- and fuel-specific contributions to this disease burden across 21 regions, 204 countries, and 200 sub-national areas by integrating 24 global atmospheric chemistry-transport model sensitivity simulations, high-resolution satellite-derived PM 2.5 exposure estimates, and disease-specific concentration response relationships. Globally, 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.74–1.36) million deaths were avoidable in 2017 by eliminating fossil-fuel combustion (27.3% of the total PM 2.5 burden), with coal contributing to over half. Other dominant global sources included residential (0.74 [0.52–0.95] million deaths; 19.2%), industrial (0.45 [0.32–0.58] million deaths; 11.7%), and energy (0.39 [0.28–0.51] million deaths; 10.2%) sectors. Our results show that regions with large anthropogenic contributions generally had the highest attributable deaths, suggesting substantial health benefits from replacing traditional energy sources.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?