Comparison between the strength of steel and cast iron crankshafts in large-scale routine fatigue bending tests

I. V. Kudryavtsev,I. T. Goncharov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01529864
IF: 0.667
1976-09-01
Strength of Materials
Abstract:ConclusionsWe have developed and verified under fatigue-test conditions a constructionally simple and technological efficient model of a crankshaft, manufactured from circular cylindrical blanks by simple machining.The bending fatigue strength of crankshafts with SPD-strengthened hollow chamfers of small radius (r:d=0.02) equals that of crankshafts with chamfers of large radius (r:d≥0.040–0.09).The high efficiency of the technological process for strengthening chamfers of small radii by SPD is confirmed by a statistical analysis of the results of fatigue tests at a reliability level of 95%.The efficiency of the SPD strengthening of small-radius chamfers will in 95 cases out of 100 lie in the range 272–346 and 240–309% for steel 45 and HTI crankshafts respectively.The strength procedures and the geometry of the chamfers before and after strengthening here assumed ensure a very efficient strengthening process, i.e., stress concentrations in the chamfer junction are almost completely eliminated.Engine crankshafts may be designed with small-radius chamfers (r:d=0.02) instead of those with large radii (r:d≥0.04–0.09) recommended in the corresponding engineering standards; this allows the support surface of the pivots to be increased by up to 8%, so reducing the wear on the shaft pivots and bearings, i.e., increasing the life of the engines.
materials science, characterization & testing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?