Abstract:Up to the early 1990's the health care system was essentially characterised through:--the insured' right of choice of therapist,--therapeutic freedom of patients and physicians, and--the freedom of establishment for medical doctors.--In accordance with the Hospital Funding Act the hospital system was--in compliance with federal constitutional law using capacity requirements--based on the "fire-fighting" principle, i.e. that if required, every patient should have access to a suitable hospital bed within about 15 minutes.--The responsibility for ensuring the provision of general and specialist health care services had been conferred by the government to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (1955) in the legal form of a public corporation. In the face of a foreseeable rise in expenses as a result of advances in medicine and a higher demand for health care services because of the demographic development (long-life society) the Advisory Council for Concerted Action in Health Care concludes in its Annual Report that maintaining this level of health care for all people is not financially viable any longer. This is why the state--on the basis of the Health Care Reform Act of 2002 and the Statutory Health Insurance System Modernisation Act of 2004--retreated from the provision of services in the ambulatory and inpatient setting by privatising these sectors and by proclaiming competition (introduction of diagnosis-related groups). Presently, the once liberal performance tradition is more and more turning into a centrally planned system in the spirit of "From Therapeutic Freedom to Therapeutic Programmes". The guidelines that on the basis of the methods of evidence-based medicine were developed by the international community of physicians for the treatment of patients with defined diagnoses and intended to be decision aids for individual treatment decisions are now used to implement disease management programmes for the provision of health care to people with certain chronic diseases. Another steering instrument of the above mentioned Modernisation Act is the definition of a list stating all the benefits available under the statutory health insurance system. The assessment of the health gain of new medical drugs and other medical procedures has been assigned to the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) specifically founded to that purpose. With regard to the assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures the Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) in the summer of 2005 gave itself a Code of Procedures that defines uniform cross-sector criteria for the appraisal of diagnosis and treatment. In Germany the principle of evidence-based health care has by law--and this is unique as compared to other countries--fully penetrated everyday health care where the decisions of the Joint Federal Committee in the form of directives have mandatory effect for health care providers and hence for the insured, too. This is why the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians have embarked on the implementation of the "National Programme for Disease Management Guidelines" and the "Health Services Research" Project as a means of continuously evaluating health care provision which are intended to guide the future political control of the system of statutory health insurance in terms of target-performance comparisons and for the purpose of identifying health care deficits.

Psychotherapy in the National Health System – a Happy Ending or Disaster for English Patients?

The provision of psychotherapy: an international comparison

Depression treatment in Germany – using claims data to compare a collaborative mental health care program to the general practitioner program and usual care in terms of guideline adherence and need-oriented access to psychotherapy

[Limitations to the physician's discretionary and therapeutic freedom and to the provision of health care for the general population by a shortage of financial and human resources--the rules of Section 2 Para. 1 and 4 of the Medical Professional Code of conduct and how much they are really worth]

Do the elderly and those with comorbid chronic physical conditions have improved access to outpatient psychotherapy post structural reforms in Germany? Results of the ES-RiP study

Transforming the Effectiveness and Equity of a Psychological Therapy Service: A Case Study in the English NHS Talking Therapies Program

Universal coverage and cost control: the United Kingdom National Health Service

Making Psychotherapy Available in the United States: Implementation Challenges and Solutions

Support services for healthcare professionals must be properly funded

[The nationwide quality assurance program of the German pension insurance scheme. Experiences of several years of routine implementation].

NHS Practitioner Health: "We've always been on the precipice of closure"

Scoping Review: Outpatient Psychotherapeutic Care for Children and Adolescents in Germany - Status Quo and Challenges in Assessment

Patient satisfaction in inpatient psychiatric treatment compared with inpatient equivalent home treatment in Germany: an in-depth qualitative study

Declaring a health and care emergency

Lost in transition? Professional perspectives on transitional mental health services for young people in Germany: a qualitative study

Lost in transition? Perceptions of health care among young people with mental health problems in Germany: a qualitative study

Psychotherapists' views on open notes: An online survey from Germany

[The landscape of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany: structures, challenges, and developments]

The perceived helpfulness and acceptability of a bespoke psychological therapy service for registered nurses experiencing psychological distress: A qualitative study

Patient Satisfaction with Psychological Treatment on a Voluntary Inpatient Psychiatric Unit

Psychosocial Health Education Within Community Mental Health Inpatient Recovery Wards In UK: Patients’ Voices