Incorporation of Drone Technology Into the Chain of Survival for OHCA: Estimation of Time Needed for Bystander Treatment of OHCA and CPR Performance
Monique A. StarksAudrey L. BlewerChristine ChowEdward SharpeLee Van VleetEvan ArnoldDaniel M. BucklandAnjni JoinerDenise SimmonsCynthia L. GreenDaniel B. MarkDepartment of Medicine,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (M.A.S..,D.B.M.).Department of Family Medicine and Community Health,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (A.L.B).Department of Population Health Sciences,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (A.L.B.).Department of Emergency Medicine Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (D.M.B.,A.J.).Duke Office of Clinical Research,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (D.S.).Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (C.L.G).Duke Clinical Research Institute,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC (M.A.S.,C.L.G.,D.B.M.).Patient Survivor and Researcher,Durham,NC (E.S.).Durham County EMS,NC (L.V.V.,A.J.).Institute for Transportation Research and Education,North Carolina State University,Raleigh,NC (E.A.).Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science,Duke University,Durham,NC (D.M.B.).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010061
2024-03-28
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Abstract:Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) hold promises in the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our objective was to estimate the time needed to perform resuscitation with a drone-delivered AED and to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality.METHODS:Mock out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations that included a 9-1-1 call, CPR, and drone-delivered AED were conducted. Each simulation was timed and video-recorded. CPR performance metrics were recorded by a Laerdal Resusci Anne Quality Feedback System. Multivariable regression modeling examined factors associated with time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock and CPR quality metrics (compression rate, depth, recoil, and chest compression fraction). Comparisons were made among those with recent CPR training (≤2 years) versus no recent (>2 years) or prior CPR training.RESULTS:We recruited 51 research participants between September 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 34 (Q1–Q3, 23–54) years, 56.9% were female, and 41.2% had recent CPR training. The median time from 9-1-1 call to initiation of CPR was 1:19 (Q1–Q3, 1:06–1:26) minutes. A median time of 1:59 (Q1–Q3, 01:50–02:20) minutes was needed to retrieve a drone-delivered AED and deliver a shock. The median CPR compression rate was 115 (Q1–Q3, 109–124) beats per minute, the correct compression depth percentage was 92% (Q1–Q3, 25–98), and the chest compression fraction was 46.7% (Q1–Q3, 39.9%–50.6%). Recent CPR training was not associated with CPR quality or time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Younger age (per 10-year increase; β, 9.97 [95% CI, 4.63–15.31] s;P<0.001) and prior experience with AED (β, −30.0 [95% CI, −50.1 to −10.0] s;P=0.004) were associated with more rapid time from 9-1-1 call to AED shock. Prior AED use (β, 6.71 [95% CI, 1.62–11.79];P=0.011) was associated with improved chest compression fraction percentage.CONCLUSION:Research participants were able to rapidly retrieve an AED from a drone while largely maintaining CPR quality according to American Heart Association guidelines. Chest compression fraction was lower than expected.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems