Abstract:When a picture is repeatedly named in the context of semantically related pictures, (homogeneous context) responses are slower than when the picture is repeatedly named in the context of unrelated pictures (heterogeneous context). This semantic interference effect in blocked-cyclic naming plays an important role in devising theories of word production. Wöhner, Mädebach, and Jescheniak [2021; Wöhner, S., Mädebach, A., & Jescheniak, J. D. Naming pictures and sounds: Stimulus type affects semantic context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47, 716-730, 2021] have shown that the effect is substantially larger when participants name environmental sounds than when they name pictures. We investigated possible reasons for this difference, using EEG and pupillometry. The behavioral data replicated Wöhner and colleagues. ERPs were more positive in the homogeneous compared with the heterogeneous context over central electrode locations between 140-180 msec and 250-350 msec for picture naming and between 250 and 350 msec for sound naming, presumably reflecting semantic interference during semantic and lexical processing. The later component was of similar size for pictures and sounds. ERPs were more negative in the homogeneous compared with the heterogeneous context over frontal electrode locations between 400 and 600 msec only for sounds. The pupillometric data showed a stronger pupil dilation in the homogeneous compared with the heterogeneous context only for sounds. The amplitudes of the late ERP negativity and pupil dilation predicted naming latencies for sounds in the homogeneous context. The latency of the effects indicates that the difference in semantic interference between picture and sound naming arises at later, presumably postlexical processing stages closer to articulation. We suggest that the processing of the auditory stimuli interferes with phonological response preparation and self-monitoring, leading to enhanced semantic interference.

A joint investigation of facilitation and interference effects of semantic and phonological similarity in a continuous naming task.

Interference effects of phonological similarity in word production arise from competitive incremental learning

Neural Correlates of Semantic Interference and Phonological Facilitation in Picture Naming: A Systematic Review and Coordinate-Based Meta-analysis

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Similarity-induced interference or facilitation in language production reflects representation, not selection

Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

Phonology and access to Chinese character meaning.

Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis

Semantic Context Effects in Picture and Sound Naming: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and Pupillometric Data

Parallel Processing of Semantics and Phonology in Spoken Production: Evidence from Blocked Cyclic Picture Naming and EEG

Neural and linguistic differences explain priming and interference during naming

Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times during noun and verb naming in agrammatic and anomic aphasia

The depth of semantic processing modulates cross‐language pattern similarity in Chinese–English bilinguals

Effects of irrelevant speech on semantic and phonological judgments of Chinese characters

What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian metaanalysis

The Processing of Visual and Phonological Configurations of Chinese One- and Two-Character Words in a Priming Task of Semantic Categorization

Phonological Activation During Semantic Access in Chinese Character Reading

Spoken word recognition of Chinese homophones: a further investigation

Semantic interference affects speech production by increasing disfluencies, not errors

Resolving competing predictions in speech: How qualitatively different cues and cue reliability contribute to phoneme identification