Abstract:Introduction Personality hardiness expresses the characteristics that help to overcome stress and achieve well-being. Objectives This study focused on the Hardiness as the important personality trait, which allow coping with stress and the relationship of empathy, emotional sensitivity and the personality hardiness. Methods 88 healthy volunteers, students aged 17 to 26 years (mean age = 19, SD = 1,69), participated in this study. We used Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), the Maddi Hardiness Survey (adapted by Leontyev), Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), the Barratt impulsiveness scale (BIS-11), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). Results The cluster analysis was used to identify groups of hardy personalities. We demonstrated a negative relationship between hardiness and depression and burnout. It revealed significant differences between these groups by the following traits: Attention (BIS-11), Self-Control (BIS-11), Cognitive Complexity (BIS-11), Hostility (BPAQ), Exploratory activity (NS1 TCI), Shyness of strangers (HA3 TCI), Resourcefulness (S3 TCI). Regression analysis was used to identify Hardiness factors and to build the following regression models. For the first group the models describe 100% of dispersion (R-square=1,000, Durbin-Watson statistic = 1,419) and are: Control = -16,998 - 2,922*С2 + 3,549*С5 + 3,264*CI + 0,723*ST2 + 0,747*S4 - 0,306*SC + 0,166*RD3 - 0,020*C — 0,003*NS2, where C2 – scale Empathy (TCI), C5 – scale Principles (TCI), CI – cognitive instability, ST2 – Transpersonal identification scale (TCI), S4 – Self-acceptance (TCI), SC – Self-Control (BIS-11), RD3 – Social attachment (TCI), C – Cooperativeness (TCI), NS2 – Impulsive decision making (TCI). The Hardiness model described 50% (R-square=0,456) of dispersion: Hardiness = 63,527 – 4,080*C2, where C2 –Empathy scale (TCI) (p=0,003). The regression models of the second group explain 50% of group dispersion (R-square=0,512) and are Independent variables significance p<0,05: Challenge = 12,484 + 0,389*SC + 0,197*EE — 0,702*RD1 — 0,206*A,where SC- Self-Control scale (BIS-11), EE – Emotional Empathy (Personality test of Emotional Empathy), RD1 – Sentimentality scale (TCI), A – Anger (BPAQ). The Hardiness model describes 35% of dispersion (R-square=0,364, Durbin-Watson statistic = 2,066): Hardiness = 100,352 + 0,941*SC — 0,527*H, where SC – Self-Control scale (BIS-11) (p=0,009), H – Hostility scale (BPAQ) (p=0,021). Conclusions Thus, the attention and self-control problems, hostility, cognitive complexity and shyness have a negative impact on hardiness.Our results suggest that the excessive use of empathy leads to decrease of ability to control situation and cope with the stress. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Type A behavior, personality hardiness, and cardiovascular responses to stress.

Control over stress, Type A behavior pattern, and response to stress.

Relationship of Trait, Type A Behavior, and Physical Fitness Variables to Cardiovascular Reactivity and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Potential

Type A behavior and the thallium stress test

Type A behavior and occupational stress: A cross-cultural study of blue-collar workers.

Impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern: Differential effects on students' health and academic achievement.

Spouse-pair risk factors and cardiovascular reactivity

The nomological validity of the Type A personality among employed adults.

Negative factors of personality hardiness that effect on ability to control situation and cope with the stress

Type A behavior is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy in male patients with essential hypertension

Type D personality and vulnerability to adverse outcomes in heart disease

The Influence of Beta Blockers on Cardiovascular Reactivity and Type A Behavior Pattern in Hypertensives1

Personality and physiological reactions to acute psychological stress

Dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular response to interpersonal stress

Trait hostility and ambulatory blood pressure among traffic enforcement agents: The effects of stressful social interactions.

Cluster analysis reveals distinct patterns of childhood adversity, behavioral disengagement, and depression that predict blunted heart rate reactivity to acute psychological stress

Hostility, Social Support, and Ambulatory Cardiovascular Activity

Expression of interpersonal aggression by angered and nonangered persons with the Type A and Type B behavior patterns.

Type a coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factor variables in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study

Type a Behavior Pattern and Motor Vehicle Drivers' Behavior

Examining the relationships among self-report measures of the Type A behavior pattern: The effects of dimensionality, measurement error, and differences in underlying constructs.