Abstract:The commercial use of membranes for water and wastewater treatment has been steadily growing for decades, and is now considered a cost-effective alternative for new treatment facilities when compared to conventional treatment systems. The state of Ohio alone has dozens of large-scale water and wastewater treatment facilities utilizing membranes; many of which have begun operation within the last ten years. Although there are advantages to utilizing membranes, their major disadvantage is their susceptibility to fouling – and particularly biological fouling (biofouling). Effective methods of mitigating biofouling are therefore critical for efficient operation and longevity of membranes. This study investigates ultrasonic cleaning of ceramic microfiltration membranes fouled by municipal membrane bioreactor wastewater. Our study gives specific attention to the composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on fouled membranes and the influences of membrane surface charge by altering the pH of ultrasonic cleaning solution. Experimental results indicate ultrasonic cleaning outperforms conventional cleaning methods (rinsing and air scouring) with post-sonication flux measured as over 30% greater than post-conventional cleaning flux. Characterization of EPS indicated proteins were effectively removed via sonication, whereas polysaccharides were more persistent foulants. Differences in pH affected both the surface charge of the membrane and the structural characteristics of the biological foulants, verified with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The highest recovery of membrane flux occurred at the pH closest to the isoelectric point of the ceramic membrane, indicating that minimizing the membrane surface charge may be a key parameter for optimizing ultrasonic cleaning. Methodology and Materials Wastewater: Domestic wastewater was collected from an MBR facility in the City of Delphos, Ohio. The wastewater was analyzed for various properties, including concentrations of proteins, polysaccharides, total suspended and volatile solids, pH, and molecular structure characteristics of the solids at varying pH using a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer. Membrane Fouling: Ceramic microfiltration (0.2 μm) membranes constructed of alpha-alumina were purchased and used for fouling and cleaning experiments. Filter cells were constructed in dead-end filtration mode and wastewater was delivered using a variable speed peristaltic pump. Permeate was collected on an electronic balance and mass was continuously recorded to calculate flux and gauge the rate and extent of fouling. Following significant decline in flux (>80% below initial flux) the membranes were removed from the filter cells for further analysis or cleaning. A photo of the experimental equipment used for the filtration tests is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Experimental apparatus used for fouling tests. Membrane Cleaning: Off-line cleaning of fouled membranes was performed via one of the following strategies: 1) conventional cleaning by rinsing with MBR wastewater and light air scouring in the aerated tank; 2) ultrasonic cleaning in pH 4 solution; 3) ultrasonic cleaning in pH 7 solution; and 4) ultrasonic cleaning in pH 9 solution. Following cleaning, membranes were either returned to the wastewater filtration cell for flux measurement or underwent fluorescent staining and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) imaging for EPS quantification. Ultrasonic cleaning equipment consisted of a glass reaction vessel affixed to an ultrasonic transducer. The reaction vessel was filled with pH-adjusted solution and membranes were submerged and sonicated at 620 kHz at 2.7 watts per cm2 for 30 seconds. Fluorescent Staining and CLSM Imaging: A quadruple staining procedure coupled with CLSM imaging was performed on fouled and cleaned membranes to identify relative quantities and spatial characteristics of EPS. The employed fluorescent stains included FITC for proteins, concanavalin A for α-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides, calcofluor white for β-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides, and STYO 63 for nucleic acids. An Olympus FV1000 CLSM (Ohio State University, Campus Microscopy and Imaging Facility) was used to observe EPS at a minimum of five random locations for each membrane analyzed. Confocal image slices were analyzed with specialty software to quantify the abundance of the four individual EPS components.

CLEANING OF CERAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES AFTER FILTRATION OF HAY HYDROLYSATE

Cleaning Methods for Ceramic Ultrafiltration Membranes Affected by Organic Fouling

Application of biosurfactant rhamnolipid for cleaning of UF membranes

Chemical Cleaning of Nanofiltration Membrane Filtrating the Effluent from a Membrane Bioreactor

Cleaning of Membrane in Combined Process of Enhanced Coagulation and Ultrafiltration

Evaluating Membrane Cleaning for Organic Fouling in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation

Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of spiral-wound membrane cleaning procedures to remove biofilms

Fouling Control in Ceramic Nanofiltration Membrane: Forward Flush and Precoating Method

Title: Characterizing the influence of surface chemistry and morphology on biofilm formation of ceramic membranes in wastewater treatment Ohio Water Resources Center: Final Project Report

Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes

BiOCl as the role of cleaner for the fabrication of self-cleaning PES membranes based on the RTIPS method

Cleaning of Fouled Ultrafiltration (UF) Membrane by Algae During Reservoir Water Treatment

Fouling and Chemical Cleaning Strategies for Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane: Synchronized Bench-Scale, Full-Scale, and Engineering Tests

Cleaning of Ultrafiltration Membranes: Long-Term Treatment of Car Wash Wastewater as a Case Study

Application of heat-activated peroxydisulfate process for the chemical cleaning of fouled ultrafiltration membranes

Cleaning for Fouled Membrane Module in Complexation-Ultrafiltration Processes with Gas/Liquid Two-Phase Flow Method

Membrane Fouling and Chemical Cleaning in Three Full-Scale Reverse Osmosis Plants Producing Demineralized Water

Cleaning Efficiency and Mechanism of Ozone Micro-Nano-bubbles on Ceramic Membrane Fouling

Consecutive Chemical Cleaning of Fouled PVC Membrane Using NaOH and Ethanol During Ultrafiltration of River Water

Operation of Hybrid Membranes for the Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Pollutants from Water and Wastewater

Fouling of a spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane processing swine wastewater: effect of cleaning procedure on fouling resistance