Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to broaden an understanding of women's perceptions regarding advancement potential/barriers to success in upper echelon corporate roles in the S&P 500 in connection with understanding 21st-century family dynamics, rather than addressing gender in isolation. Design/methodology/approach Data collection in this study is based on semi-structured phone interviews with 13 women who have been identified by organizational leadership in an S&P 500 company as having high advancement potential. The results are evaluated using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Findings Participants' responses support existing research showing that women feel more responsible than their male counterparts for subordinating their career prospects to those of their male partners. Further, participants express that work–life and work–family balance constitute problematic barriers to advancement and often lead them to “choose” to slow-track career advancement and to avoid advancement opportunities. This choice narrative propagates women's perceptions that barriers to advancement are self-imposed. Participants viewed the extreme work model as inevitable in upper-echelon corporate roles, signaling the need for an increased understanding of how a broad definition of familial roles and work culture – rather than gendered issues in isolation – affect advancement opportunities in a 21st-century workforce. Practical implications Current organizational diversity initiatives have focused too myopically on gender. For organizations to create a more inclusive model for success at the upper echelons, it is essential to broaden organizational initiatives to address 21st-century employees rather than gendered programs. Organizations can endeavor to implement more effective models that enable two partners in a home with dependent children to advance, and all employees, even top leaders, to balance current definitions of work–life in several ways discussed. Originality/value The findings of this study are significant, in that they move toward addressing a gap in knowledge concerning women's perspectives on the changing family paradigm, extreme work culture and an expanded understanding of work–life balance. This reconceptualization can help mitigate gendered research and organizational programs that reinforce entrenched binaries, and instead enable organizations to implement more effective initiatives to improve advancement opportunities.

Job and life attitudes of male executives.

The Effect of Organizational Factors on Job Engagement

The Stress of the Executive Life Style: Trends in the 1990s

Financial stress and leadership behavior: The role of leader gender.

Predictors of Work-Family Conflict and Satisfaction with Family, Job, Career, and Life

Effect of employee gender and behavioral style on the evaluations of male and female banking executives.

Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility

JOB SEARCH BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYED MANAGERS

Manager's Work-Life Integration Attitude and its Effects

Differences among a satisfied, a meaningful, and a psychologically rich working life

Beyond gender: reconceptualizing understandings of work–life balance and the extreme work model for 21st-century high-potential top earners

What men and women value at work: implications for workplace health

The effects of work control and job demands on employee adjustment and work performance

Work-life balance and employee commitment: mediating effect of job satisfaction

[Appraisal of Occupational Stress and Its Influential Factors in Executive Group].

Business Results and Well-Being: An Engaging Leadership Intervention Study

Executive Extraversion: Career and Firm Outcomes

Examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce discriminatory behavior at work: An attitude dimension consistency perspective

Organization-based self-esteem and work-life outcomes

Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives.

Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work–family conflict with job and life satisfaction.