Abstract:Sugar beet molasses is a low-value byproduct from the sugar industry. It contains significant amounts of sucrose (approx. 50% (w/w)), which can be used for many different applications, for example, as feedstock for the production of fuel (as ethanol) and biobased chemicals such as 5-hydoxymethyl furfural (HMF). To produce platform chemicals, sucrose is hydrolyzed into its monomeric C6 sugars: glucose and fructose. When comparing the hydrolysis rates of molasses with a pure sucrose solution, the specific reaction rate is much slower (Qp/x,60min = 93 and 70 gprod L−1 h−1 gcell−1 for pure sucrose and crude molasses, respectively) at the same sucrose concentration (300 g/L) and process conditions. To clarify why molasses inhibits the enzymatic hydrolysis rate, the influence of its viscosity and inorganic and organic composition was investigated. Also, the effects of molasses and treated molasses on pure enzymes, invertase (from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 0.05 mg/mL), compared with hydrolysis using whole cells of Baker's yeast (3 mg/mL), were tested. The results indicate an inhibitory effect of potassium (Qp/x,60min = 76 gprod L−1 h−1 gcell−1), generally at high salt concentrations (Qp/x,60min = 67 gprod L−1 h−1 gcell−1), which could be correlated to the solution's high salt concentrations and possibly the synergistic effects of different ions when applying concentrations that were four times that in the molasses. Also, the viscosity and sucrose purity seem to have an effect, where pure sucrose solutions and thick juice from the sugar mill yielded higher hydrolysis rates (Qp/x,60min = 97 gprod L−1 h−1 gcell−1) than molasses-type solutions with a higher viscosity (Qp/x,60min = 70–74 gprod L−1 h−1 gcell−1). Attempting to further understand the effects of different components on the invertase activity, an in silico investigation was performed, indicating that high salt concentrations affected the binding of sucrose to the active site of the enzyme, which can result in a lower reaction rate. This knowledge is important for future scale-up of the hydrolysis process, since reduced hydrolysis rates require larger volumes to provide a certain productivity, requiring larger process equipment and thereby higher investment costs.

Factors affecting invertase activity in soils

Purification and characterisation of soluble invertases from leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana

Effect of pH on enzyme stability in soils

An evaluation of the substrate-induced respiration method

Meta-analysis of Experimental Warming on Soil Invertase and Urease Activities

Relationships between soil pH and microbial properties in a UK arable soil

Real-time assay of invertase activity using isoquinolinylboronic acid as turn-on fluorescent sensor

Characterization of a novel low-temperature-active, alkaline and sucrose-tolerant invertase

Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil

Nitrogen mineralisation along a pH gradient of a silty loam UK soil

Enhanced acido-thermophilic invertase production via a derepressed mutant of Pichia kudriavzevii in batch cultures

Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil

Investigating the Inhibitory Factors of Sucrose Hydrolysis in Sugar Beet Molasses with Yeast and Invertase

Inactivation kinetics of invertase in honey and honey-glucose syrup formulations: effects of temperature and water activity

Kinetics of Sucrose Hydrolysis by Immobilized Recombinant Pichia pastoris Cells in a Batch reactors

Contrasting Soil Ph Effects on Fungal and Bacterial Growth Suggest Functional Redundancy in Carbon Mineralization

Role of enzyme stability in controlling histidine deaminating activity in soil

Differences in Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization in Soils of Differing Initial Ph Induced by Electrokinesis and Receiving Crop Residue Amendments

Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate

The Soil Enzyme Activities with Age of Tea in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Denitrification in soil. II. Factors affecting denitrification