Abstract:Comments on the article by Campbell et al. (see record 2021-21096-001). Campbell et al. (2021) claimed motivational intensity (approach–avoidance) is a redundant construct that is merely another label for valence (positive–negative). They based their conclusion on a high correlation between valence and motivational intensity when participants rated pictures. We present arguments that their conclusion was based on inadequate evidence. First, we explain how high correlation fails to identify meaningful and consistent affective states where motivational intensity is essential. As a counterargument, we present replicated and cumulative empirical evidence of differences between affective states with equal valence and arousal but different motivational intensities such as desire or enthusiasm versus amusement. Second, we emphasize that correlations do not account for relative differences between valence and motivational intensity levels (which we termed undermotivated and overmotivated affect). We illustrate this by presenting how valence and motivational intensity diverge during watching affective video clips. We conclude the opposite of Campbell's team, that is, motivational intensity is a viable concept deserving further attention. However, studying motivational intensity requires specific strategies to dissect what is possible within affect from the most frequent. We formulate several recommendations regarding the choice of stimuli (overrepresentation of specific categories) and measurement (e.g., measuring dimensions of affect along with a broad range of discrete emotions and motivational concepts). This might improve the study in affective science toward stronger differentiation within the core of human affect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?

Running head: THE FACTOR STRUCTURE The Factor Structure of Chinese Personality Terms

A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages

The factor structure of Chinese personality terms.

Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries

Think Versus Feel: Two Dimensions of Brand Anthropomorphism: an Abstract

A Network Perspective on Attitude Strength: Testing the Connectivity Hypothesis

Definitional ambiguities in character strengths: A comparative analysis with personality and other psychobiological attributes

Attitudes toward computers: a new attitudinal dimension.

Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations

Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers

The dominance of introspective measures and what this implies: The example of environmental attitude

Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development

Affective super-traits and/or individual patterns: a variable-centered and a person-centered approach of primary emotional aspects of personality

The Structure Among Measures of Personality, Social Attitudes, Values, and Social Norms

Relationships between Big Five personality traits and individual-level cultural components

What defines Traits, Reputations, and Identity? Personality item content in multi-rater judgments

The expanded view of individualism and collectivism: One, two, or four dimensions?

Validating a brief measure of four facets of social evaluation

Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment.

Motivational intensity and valence are married, but they are not the same person: Commentary on Campbell et al. (2021).