Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research.

Jason A. Colquitt,Jeffrey A. LePine,Raymond A. Noe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678
IF: 11.8025
2000-01-01
Journal of Applied Psychology
Abstract:This article meta-analytically summarizes the literature on training motivation, its antecedents, and its relationships with training outcomes such as declarative knowledge, skill acquisition, and transfer. Significant predictors of training motivation and outcomes included individual characteristics (e.g., locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, age, cognitive ability, self-efficacy, valence, job involvement) and situational characteristics (e.g., climate). Moreover, training motivation explained incremental variance in training outcomes beyond the effects of cognitive ability. Meta-analytic path analyses further showed that the effects of personality, climate, and age on training outcomes were only partially mediated by self-efficacy, valence, and job involvement. These findings are discussed in terms of their practical significance and their implications for an integrative theory of training motivation.
psychology, applied,management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is a comprehensive understanding of training motivation and its influencing factors. Specifically, the paper aims to integrate the research on training motivation in the past 20 years through meta - analytic path analysis to establish a comprehensive training motivation theory. The researchers are concerned with how individual characteristics (such as locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, age, cognitive ability, self - efficacy, value, job involvement, etc.) and situational characteristics (such as atmosphere) affect training motivation, and how these factors further affect training outcomes, such as declarative knowledge, skill acquisition and transfer, etc. The paper solves this problem through the following steps: 1. **Literature Review**: Conduct a narrative review of existing research, focusing on specific variables that have been associated with motivation or learning theories and training effectiveness and have been examined in multiple training studies. 2. **Theoretical Structure Construction**: Based on the existing training motivation models, organize these variables into two competing theoretical structures. One believes that the influence of distal variables is completely mediated by proximal variables, and the other believes that there is only partial mediation. 3. **Meta - analysis**: Use the meta - analysis method to obtain the corrected correlation values for each relationship. 4. **Path Analysis**: Test which theoretical structure best fits the empirical findings in the literature through meta - analytic path analysis. Through this process, the researchers hope to provide a clearer and more consistent framework for understanding which specific factors can be used to enhance training motivation and thus improve training effectiveness.