Abstract:There is a growing body of evidence showing that humans make automatic and reliable personality inferences from facial appearance. Interestingly, it has been robustly shown that the recognition of other-race faces is impaired compared to same-race faces (the so-called other-race effect), with categorization of gender and age also achieved inefficiently. However, the extent to which the ability of making reliable inferences from faces generalizes across cultures and faces from different races is poorly understood. This issue is even timelier considering recent studies that have challenged the universality of face processing. For instance, we recently showed that Westerners predominantly fixate the eyes during face recognition, whereas Easterners fixate the central region of the face (i.e., nose) (Blais et al., 2008). Culture also modulates the strategy observers use to gather visual information during facial expression categorization (Jack et al., 2009). Therefore, asking whether social judgments from faces generalize across cultures is a natural question to be addressed. To this aim, we tested Western Caucasian and East Asian observers performing visual and social judgments from all the combinations of face pairs sampled from 40 Western Caucasian and 40 East Asian unfamiliar faces. Observers from both cultures first evaluated the physical and the social similarity of each face pair. Subsequently, observers performed binary social evaluations on the same face pairs for attractiveness, competence, trustworthiness and warmth. All binary decisions were paired with a measure of confidence. Finally, we represented the face space for each of the judgments in matrices of dissimilarity weighted by confidence levels for each observer and culture. Mantel correlations performed on the matrices of dissimilarity indicated a fairly robust agreement across cultures for all judgments, both visual and social. Our data show that humans rely on universal rules to perform trait inferences from facial appearance.

Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness.

Social Judgments from Faces Are Universal

The Impact of Physical Attractiveness, Gender, and Teaching Philosophy on Teacher Evaluations

Beyond the Lab: Validating Personality Impressions and Behavioral Observations in Online Video Calls

Nonverbal Immediacy Analysis in Education: A Multimodal Computational Model

The "Central Tendency Bias" in the Assessment of Facial Attractiveness in Group-Based and Individual Ratings – A Survey-based Study in 727 Volunteers

The Effect of Moral Behavior on Facial Attractiveness

Better-than-chance prediction of cooperative behaviour from first and second impressions

Facial asymmetry: A Computer Vision based behaviometric index for assessment during a face-to-face interview

Measuring Mothers’ Warmth: Naïve Observers, Trained Coders, and Self-Reports

Don't judge a book by its cover: First impressions from faces are consensual but inaccurate

Facial misfits accelerate stereotype-based associative learning

Some like it hot - visual guidance for preference prediction

The effect of teaching style and academic motivation on student evaluation of teaching: Insights from social cognition

An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Teacher Attractiveness on Undergraduates' Perceptions of Teacher–Student Sexual Involvement

Modern Physiognomy: an Investigation on Predicting Personality Traits and Intelligence from the Human Face

Impact of Physical Educators’ Appearance and Sex on Elementary School Students’ Learning and Perceptions of the Teachers

The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the evaluations actually measure

Between-teacher variance of students' teacher-rated risk for emotional, behavioral, and adaptive functioning

Beauty and the Eye of the Beholder: Gender and Attractiveness Affect Judgments in Teacher Sex Offense Cases

Testing the Effect of Sending an Evaluative Message on Perceiving Others in Computer-Mediated Communication