Abstract:To help understand modern financial accounting theory ('FAT') and its role in the development of finance and business, I consider two current mainstream histories of its development and offer a third alternative. The standard setters’ version is that increasingly FAT is rationally derived from a basically coherent conceptual framework, currently focused on 'comprehensive income' as measured by 'changes in assets and liabilities', in turn preferably measured at fair values. However, examination here of several recent FASB/IASB standards and exposure drafts shows that instead they unavoidably bear the marks of the history of a variety of now embedded practices that have shaped thinking about, and vested interests in, what is 'good accounting'. By contrast, some recent academic versions of history focus on how 'conservative', historical-cost based accounting principles have rationally evolved to provide an anchor on which to base appraisal of firms’ and managers’ performance, prospects and risks, and supply the kind of information that investors and other parties in the capital markets need to help overcome the information asymmetry between them and corporate managers. After analyzing the limitations of this second type of history, I argue that even a brief genealogical examination of the conditions of possibility that have led to the growth and changes in accounting and auditing practices and discourses, and in the power-knowledge relations that they have engendered at different stages over the millennia of recorded history, suggests that their power has always been more that of 'institutional rationalized myth'. The twin rational myths of the objectivity of accounting and of auditing together provide the structure that offers the comfort necessary to enable the various agents in the modern, increasingly global, economy to undertake and finance the risks of acting 'at a distance' and across time. This modern, grammatocentric accountability increasingly extends throughout the institutions that coordinate modern societies, in the rising East as well as in the established West. Exploring how much of FAT is rational and reflects some objective 'economic reality' and how much is myth and is subjectively, socially constructed; and, again, how much might be improved and how much is intractable, are the major questions now for accounting, auditing and finance policy-making and research. This requires further detailed comparative international historical understanding of how accounting and auditing have variously operated, within businesses and other organizations and in shaping markets, across different countries and cultures.

The Expansion of Modern Accounting as a Global and Institutional Practice

Paradigm Revolution of Accounting Theory:Hesitancy and Pondering before Dawn

Accounting as a social and institutional practice: perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change

Understanding the changes in accounting thought

Situated rationalities in response to institutional complexity: the role of management accounting practices

Management Accounting Practice and Its Theoretical Explanation:An International Perspective

Accounting and Organisation Change

Strategising management accounting: liberal origins and neoliberal trends

Accounting, Ideological and Political Work and Chinese multinational operations: A neo-Gramscian perspective

Pros and Cons of the Globalization of the World Economy Impact on the Development of Accounting

COVID-19 and accounting as multidimensional technical, social and moral practice: a framework for future research

Opening the Door to Accounting Change. Transformations in Chinese Public Sector Accounting

Opening the Door to Accounting Change: Transformations in Chinese Public Sector Accounting

Management accounting practices and organizational change aspects in the public sector: contextual/processual approach

Expanding the Horizons of Accounting Education: Incorporating Social and Critical Perspectives

Management accounting change: critical review and a new contextual framework

Enterprise Transformation in the Digital Age

Management accounting and organisational change: an institutional perspective

Fair Value vs Conservatism? Aspects of the History of Accounting, Auditing, Business and Finance from Ancient Mesopotamia to Modern China

Comparative characteristics of accounting models

INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN THE REGULATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF ACCOUNTANTS