Abstract:RNAs with 5′‐triphosphate (ppp) are detected in the cytoplasm principally by the innate immune receptor RIG‐I, whose activation triggers a Type I interferon response. Cellular RNAs undergo post‐transcriptional modifications which ensures that self RNAs do not carry 5′ppp and/or blunt‐ends. We carried out a thorough biochemical characterization of RIG‐I complexes with RNAs carrying various end‐modifications as well as measured the effect of these end‐modifications on their signaling activity. We find that discrimination of RNA ligands occurs at multiple stages and signaling RNAs have high affinity and ATPase turnover rate and thus a high k atpase / K d . Our studies reveal that the autoinhibitory interface between CARD2 (second CARD) and Hel2i (Helicase 2 insertion domain) plays a critical role in RNA selectivity, wherein this interface acts as a “gate” that prevents cellular RNAs from generating productive complexes that can signal. It is thought that self RNAs like mRNAs are not recognized by RIG‐I because 5′ppp is capped by the addition of a 7‐methyl guanosine (m7G) (Cap‐0) and the 5′‐end nucleotide ribose is 2′‐O‐methylated (Cap‐1). We provide a structural and mechanistic basis for the exact roles of capping and 2′‐O‐methylation in evading RIG‐I recognition using enzymatic assays, X‐ray crystallography and cell‐based signaling studies. Surprisingly, we find that Cap‐0 and 5′ppp dsRNA have similar binding affinities, activate RIG‐I's ATPase to the same extent, and shows the same cellular signaling response. Three new crystal structures of RIG‐I complexes with dsRNA bearing 5′OH, 5′ppp, and 5′Cap‐0 reveal that RIG‐I accommodates m7G in a cavity created through conformational changes in helicase‐motif IVa without perturbing the triphosphate interactions. In contrast, Cap‐1 modifications abrogate RIG‐I signaling through a mechanism involving the H830 residue, wherein 2′‐O‐methylation works synergistically with m7G capping to weaken RNA affinity and ATPase activity. Our work provides new structural insights into the host and viral immune evasive mechanisms from RIG‐I explaining the complexity of cap structures over evolution. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by NIH grant GM111959 to Joseph Marcotrigiano and Smita S Patel.

MicroRNA as bioaptamers in RNP cytokines [ribokines] and codes for epigenetic phenotype alterations and self‐tolerance: Sequence‐defined endogenous redox‐ and metalloregulated, edited and modified “non‐coding” small hairpin RNA

MicroRNAs: small RNAs with big effects

Molecular Basis for the Increased Affinity of an RNA Recognition Motif with Re-Engineered Specificity: A Molecular Dynamics and Enhanced Sampling Simulations Study.

The Role of RNA Editing in the Immune Response

SY-9 Stimulation of Innate Immunity by Short Interfering and Micro RNAs

Microprotein-encoding RNA regulation in cells treated with pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic stimuli

Modulation of Micro RNA/RNAi Pathway

Structural and Mechanistic Basis for Self Versus Non‐self RNA Discrimination by the Innate Immune Receptor RIG‐I

Network Approaches to Study Endogenous RNA Competition and Its Impact on Tissue-Specific microRNA Functions

A snoRNA-tRNA modification network governs codon-biased cellular states

A Small Molecule Enhances RNA Interference and Promotes Microrna Processing

RNA–DNA fibers and polygons with controlled immunorecognition activate RNAi, FRET and transcriptional regulation of NF-κB in human cells

An Extracellular Mirna‐responsive Artificial Receptor Via Dynamic DNA Nano‐assembly for Biomarker‐Driven Therapy

RNA M6a and 5hmc Regulate Monocyte and Macrophage Gene Expression Programs

MicroRNA: noncoding but still coding, another example of self-catalysis

MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation

On the rules of engagement for microRNAs targeting protein coding regions

miRNA, siRNA, piRNA: Knowns of the unknown

Endogenous and artificial miRNAs explore a rich variety of conformations: a potential relationship between secondary structure and biological functionality

Deciphering miRNAs’ Action through miRNA Editing

High Doses of Sirnas Induce Eri-1 and Adar-1 Gene Expression and Reduce the Efficiency of RNA Interference in the Mouse