Abstract:Background: Research with college students has supported a model of writing approaches that defines the relationship between a writer and writing task along a deep and surface process continuum (Biggs, 1988). Based on that model, Lavelle (1993) developed the Inventory of Processes in College Composition which reflects students' motives and strategies as related to writing outcomes. It is also important to define the approaches of secondary students to better understand writing processes at that level, and development in written composition. Aims: This study was designed to define the writing approaches of secondary students by factor analysing students' responses to items regarding writing beliefs and writing strategies, and to compare the secondary approaches to those of college students. A related goal was to explore the relationships of the secondary writing approaches to perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), writing preferences, and writing outcomes. Samples: The initial, factor analytic phase involved 398 junior level high school students (11th grade) enrolled in a mandatory language arts class at each of three large Midwestern high schools (USA). Then, 49 junior level students enrolled in two language arts classes participated as subjects in the second phase. Method: Classroom teachers administered the Inventory of Processes in College Composition (Lavelle, 1993), which contained 72 true-or-false items regarding writing beliefs and strategies, during regular class periods. Data were factor analysed and the structure compared to that of college students. In the second phase, the new inventory, Inventory of Processes in Secondary Composition, was administered in conjunction with the Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy for Writing Inventory (Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994), and a writing preferences survey. A writing sample and grade in Language Arts classes were obtained and served as outcome variables. Results: The factor structure of secondary writing reflected three process dimensions. The first factor, Elaborative-Expressive, describes a writing strategy based on personal investment and audience concern. The second factor, Planful-Procedural, denotes sticking to a plan, following the rules, and 'preparing' for writing. Achieving-Competitive, the third factor, reflects a 'teacher pleasing' strategy or doing only what needs to be done to get a good grade. Two factors from the college model, Elaborative and Procedural, were replicated, and two were not, Reflective-Revision and Low Self-Efficacy. Regression analyses supported that the processes in writing under a timed condition are different from those used when writing over time, and that students' perceptions of writing self-regulatory efficacy were predictive of writing success under both conditions.

Writing‐to‐learn Strategies in Secondary School Cell Biology: A mixed method study

Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects

The writing approaches of secondary students

Explicit Strategy-Based Instruction in L2 Writing Contexts: A Perspective of Self-Regulated Learning and Formative Assessment

Improved content mastery and written communication through a lab-report assignment with peer review: an example from a quantum engineering course

The Implementation of Brain-Writing Strategy to Enhance Hortatory Essay in High School Students’ Writing

The Writing Achievement, Metacognitive Knowledge of Writing and Motivation of Middle-School Students with Learning Difficulties

Researching Innovations in English Language Writing Instruction: A State-of-the-art Review

Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course

Differences that matter: inquiry-based learning approach to research writing instruction

The Sensitivity of a Scenario-Based Assessment of Written Argumentation to School Differences in Curriculum and Instruction

Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: a best evidence meta-analysis

Reading and synthesising science texts using a scientific argumentation model by undergraduate biology students

The effectiveness of scenario-based virtual laboratory simulations to improve learning outcomes and scientific report writing skills

Promoting Strategic Writing by Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities: A Report of Three Case Studies

Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn

Writing Strategies for Elementary Multilingual Writers: A Systematic Review

Evaluation of the Impact of the Writing Program on Student Learning

The influences of integrating reading, peer evaluation, and discussion on undergraduate students’ scientific writing

Examination of Genre-based Strategy Instruction in Middle School English Language Arts and Science

A longitudinal intervention study of the effects of increasing amount of meaningful writing across grades 1 and 2