DEVELOPMENT OF CFD BASED SPLIT BODY METHODOLOGY FOR MISSILE AERODYNAMICS ESTIMATION
E. Usta,Batuhan Nasuhbeyoğlu,Ertan Demiral
2019-09-01
Abstract:Accurate estimation of the missile aerodynamic coefficients at the design stage is of great importance in predicting design configuration aerodynamic performance parameters. In order to determine aerodynamic characteristics of the missile configuration, significant number of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solutions are needed. Nevertheless, performing CFD analyses are expensive and require high computational power. In this study, a new approach named as “split body method” for the estimation of missile aerodynamic coefficients in an accurate and efficient manner is introduced. In this method, estimation of the interference effects between the missile body and tail fin panels with limited number of CFD analyses is achieved. For this purpose, the missile body is divided into four equal quadrants each with a separate zone name and the tail fin panel in each quadrant is set to different deflection angle. In this way, individual interference between each tail fin and quarter body can be calculated for any flight condition. Thus, the split body solution allows us to extend the results of these four quadrants which will be used in various combinations of panel deflections for estimating missile aerodynamic coefficients. After a validation study of the CFD analysis tool with Tandem Control Missile, the methodology was tested in different combinations of panel deflection angles for the same missile configuration. The results of this study indicate that the split body method (SBM) is successful for the estimation of missile aerodynamic coefficients. INTRODUCTION A standard cruciform missile configuration consists of a fin set with four panel surfaces. Convention of the panel numbering from rear view is shown in Figure 1. For such a standard missile configuration, the aerodynamic coefficient estimation can be made utilizing wind tunnel tests, semi-empirical codes, CFD analyses and flight tests. Semi-empirical codes are cheapest but they are inaccurate, wind tunnels are expensive and limited; on the other hand, 1 Aerodynamic Design Engineer at ROKETSAN Missile Industries Inc., Email: engin.usta@roketsan.com.tr 2 Aerodynamic Modelling and Analysis Engineer at ROKETSAN Missile Industries Inc., Email: bnasuhbeyoglu@roketsan.com.tr 3 Aerodynamic Design Engineer at ROKETSAN Missile Industries Inc., Email: ertan.demiral@roketsan.com.tr AIAC-2019-140 Usta, Nasuhbeyoğlu & Demiral 2 Ankara International Aerospace Conference CFD is less expensive and most accurate computational solution [Usta, 2015]. Therefore, it is preferable to use CFD based aerodynamic coefficients in intermediate design phases. Figure 1 Panel Numbers Viewing from the Missile Base (Rear view) CFD solutions require a lot of computational resources. Hence, it is highly desired to be able to extend a limited number of solutions. A study based on periodicity was conducted for extending wind tunnel results by Kim, D. in database generation [Kim, 2018]. It is asserted in this paper that a database generation method can be developed with a smart selection of the flight conditions for CFD run points and modification of the solid model zones. In a standard CFD analysis, the missile body is modelled as a single zone as shown in Figure 2. In this paper, instead of single body zone, the body is split to four equal parts as shown in Figure 3 each with its own panel of influence. Figure 2 Conventional TCM Geometry Nose Canard1
Physics,Engineering