Abstract:Humanity for centuries has perfected skills of interpersonal interactions and evolved patterns that enable people to detect lies and deceiving behavior of others in face-to-face settings. Unprecedented growth of people's access to mobile phones and social media raises an important question: How does this new technology influence people's interactions and support the use of traditional patterns? In this article, we answer this question for homophily-driven patterns in social media. In our previous studies, we found that, on a university campus, changes in student opinions were driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. Here, we demonstrate that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the same desire. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users. On Parler, an initially stable group of Right-biased users evolved into a permanent Right-leaning echo chamber dominating weaker, transient groups of members with opposing political biases. In contrast, on Twitter, the initial presence of two large opposing bias groups led to the evolution of a bimodal bias distribution, with a high degree of polarization. We capture the movement of users from the initial to final bias groups during the tracking period. We also show that user choices are influenced by side-effects of homophily. Users entering the platform attempt to find a sufficiently large group whose members hold political biases within the range sufficiently close to their own. If successful, they stabilize their biases and become permanent members of the group. Otherwise, they leave the platform. We believe that the dynamics of users' behavior uncovered in this article create a foundation for technical solutions supporting social groups on social media and socially aware networks.

Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media

Information sharing and political polarisation on social media: The role of falsehood and partisanship

Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility

Negative online news articles are shared more to social media

Attraction to politically extreme users on social media

Social Media Algorithms Can Shape Affective Polarization via Exposure to Antidemocratic Attitudes and Partisan Animosity

In-Group Love, Out-Group Hate: A Framework to Measure Affective Polarization via Contentious Online Discussions

Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

Keep Them Engaged! Investigating the Effects of Self-centered Social Media Communication Style on User Engagement in 12 European Countries

Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Media

Affective and interactional polarization align across countries

Social identity shapes antecedents and functional outcomes of moral emotion expression in online networks

The event-driven nature of online political hostility: How offline political events make online interactions more hostile

Affective Polarization and Dynamics of Information Spread in Online Networks

Decoding Political Polarization in Social Media Interactions

Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties

Partisan Asymmetries in Exposure to Misinformation

Whose media are hostile? The spillover effect of interpersonal discussions on media bias perceptions

Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users

The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review