Abstract:The beef industry must become more responsive to the changing market place and consumer demands. An essential part of this is quantifying a consumer's perception of the eating quality of beef and their willingness to pay for that quality, across a broad range of demographics. Over 19 000 consumers from Northern Ireland, Poland, Ireland and France each tasted seven beef samples and scored them for tenderness, juiciness, flavour liking and overall liking. These scores were weighted and combined to create a fifth score, termed the Meat Quality 4 score (MQ4) (0.3×tenderness, 0.1×juiciness, 0.3×flavour liking and 0.3×overall liking). They also allocated the beef samples into one of four quality grades that best described the sample; unsatisfactory, good-every-day, better-than-every-day or premium. After the completion of the tasting panel, consumers were then asked to detail, in their own currency, their willingness to pay for these four categories which was subsequently converted to a proportion relative to the good-every-day category (P-WTP). Consumers also answered a short demographic questionnaire. The four sensory scores, the MQ4 score and the P-WTP were analysed separately, as dependant variables in linear mixed effects models. The answers from the demographic questionnaire were included in the model as fixed effects. Overall, there were only small differences in consumer scores and P-WTP between demographic groups. Consumers who preferred their beef cooked medium or well-done scored beef higher, except in Poland, where the opposite trend was found. This may be because Polish consumers were more likely to prefer their beef cooked well-done, but samples were cooked medium for this group. There was a small positive relationship with the importance of beef in the diet, increasing sensory scores by about 4% in Poland and Northern Ireland. Men also scored beef about 2% higher than women for most sensory scores in most countries. In most countries, consumers were willing to pay between 150 and 200% more for premium beef, and there was a 50% penalty in value for unsatisfactory beef. After quality grade, by far the greatest influence on P-WTP was country of origin. Consumer age also had a small negative relationship with P-WTP. The results indicate that a single quality score could reliably describe the eating quality experienced by all consumers. In addition, if reliable quality information is delivered to consumers they will pay more for better quality beef, which would add value to the beef industry and encourage improvements in quality.

Marketing a Branded Fresh Beef Product

The Promising Effect Of A Green Food Label In The New Online Market

The Value of "Made in USA": Impact of Chinese acquisition of a US Company on Consumer Willingness to Pay

Consumers’ valuation for cultured meat: a multi-city choice experiment in China

Seasonality Effects on Consumers Preferences Over Quality Attributes of Different Beef Products

CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TENNESSEE CERTIFIED BEEF

Consumer Trust and Purchase of Perishable Fresh Food Online Versus In-Store: The Case of beef

German and British Consumer Willingness to Pay for Beef Labeled with Food Safety Attributes

Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay

A survey of Kansas beef producers and consumers who participate in business-to-consumer marketing of beef

United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys - A review

Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter?

Perception Bias, Social Embedding and Consumer Willingness to Pay for Chilled Pork Packaging: Empirical Analysis Based on Multiple Experiments

Dual Branding: How Corporate Names Add Value

2018 National Beef Flavor Audit: Consumer and Descriptive Sensory Attributes

Consumers' beef purchasing behavior across countries

Consumer Perception of Beef Quality and How to Control, Improve and Predict It? Focus on Eating Quality

Chinese consumer perception and purchasing behavior of beef - Mainly in North and East China

Color and Marbling as Predictors of Meat Quality Perception of Argentinian Consumers

An Exploratory Study of the Purchase and Consumption of Beef: Geographical and Cultural Differences between Spain and Brazil

Investigation of Smoked Beef Brisket Palatability from Three USDA Quality Grades