Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to transform how government agencies do their work. Rapid developments in AI have the potential to reduce the cost of core governance functions, improve the quality of decisions, and unleash the power of administrative data, thereby making government performance more efficient and effective. Agencies that use AI to realize these gains will also confront important questions about the proper design of algorithms and user interfaces, the respective scope of human and machine decision-making, the boundaries between public actions and private contracting, their own capacity to learn over time using AI, and whether the use of AI is even permitted.These are important issues for public debate and academic inquiry. Yet little is known about how agencies are currently using AI systems beyond a few headline-grabbing examples or surface-level descriptions. Moreover, even amidst growing public and scholarly discussion about how society might regulate government use of AI, little attention has been devoted to how agencies acquire such tools in the first place or oversee their use. In an effort to fill these gaps, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) commissioned this report from researchers at Stanford University and New York University. The research team included a diverse set of lawyers, law students, computer scientists, and social scientists with the capacity to analyze these cutting-edge issues from technical, legal, and policy angles. The resulting report offers three cuts at federal agency use of AI:(i) a rigorous canvass of AI use at the 142 most significant federal departments, agencies, and sub-agencies (Part I)(ii) a series of in-depth but accessible case studies of specific AI applications at eight leading agencies (SEC, CPB, SSA, USPTO, FDA, FCC, CFPB, USPS) covering a range of governance tasks (Part II); and(iii) a set of cross-cutting analyses of the institutional, legal, and policy challenges raised by agency use of AI (Part III).

Administrative Law in the Automated State

自动化的行政国家：合法性危机

Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making

Discretion in the Automated Administrative State

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions

Governing by Algorithm? No Noise and (Potentially) Less Bias

Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies

Imposing Regulation on Advanced Algorithms

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Rules, Standards, and Judicial Discretion

Artificial Intelligence in Government: Risks and Challenges of Algorithmic Governance in the Administrative State

The Challenges of AI-Decision-Making in Government and Administrative Law: A Proposal for Regulatory Design

Automatic Authorities: Power and AI

Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality?

Artificially Intelligent Regulation

Legal issues arising from the use of artificial intelligence in government tax administration and decision making

Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law

Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State

Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI)

Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust

Legitimate Power, Illegitimate Automation: The problem of ignoring legitimacy in automated decision systems