Technology and the Courts: Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Impartiality

Monika Zalnieriute

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867901

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In this submission to Australian Law Reform Commission, I argue that any reforms to the laws on judicial impartiality and bias in Australia should take into account the role of technology in judicial decision-making. From digitization of court filing and administrative systems, to automation of decision-making in small claims litigation, to machine learning software in criminal sentencing, the judiciary is increasingly - or may soon be – using various technologies. Some see the technologization of the judicial role as inevitable, and call for a speedy embrace of automation by the courts to better perform their public role. However, to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice; the law reform must consider how the increasing experimentation and proposals to automate judicial decision-making, or elements of it, especially with machine learning tools, can enhance or undermine the legal system and the judiciary as a whole. In my recent work, I examined the compatibility of various automation tools with fundamental principles of justice and how they strengthen and undermine the rule of law. I also analyzed how automated systems in judicial decision-making affect judicial values to understand where the technology might go in the future and the dangers it could bring for the judicial role. In this submission, I share the most relevant insights form that work on the relationship between technology and judicial impartiality, decisional independence and bias.