Abstract:In spite of their lower socioeconomic position in comparison to urban citizens, migrant workers usually report higher subjective well-being.Two interpretations address this inconsistency between objective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being judgement: homogeneous reference group hypothesis (HRG) and the prospect of upward mobility hypothesis (PUM).These two theories imply that migrant workers may choose different reference groups when engaging in social comparison.On one hand, HRG suggests that migrant workers may compare their income with that of other farmers in their origins, therefore their lower income status relative to urban workers won't hurt their evaluation of well-being.On the other hand, PUM suggests urban workers are migrant workers' reference group, acting as a signal of their income status in the future;thus the positive effect from expectation of upward mobility would overwhelm the negative influence of current lower income status.Based on large-scale nationally representative survey data, we test the above hypotheses by constructing multiple reference groups of migrant workers (i.e.farmers, migrant workers and urban workers).Our findings support the homogeneous reference group hypothesis: holding one's own income constant, the more other farmers in same province earn, the less satisfied migrant workers are, indicating migrant workers' higher income status relative to other farmers has a significant effect on their subjective well-being.Furthermore, the mysterious subjective well-being premium of migrant workers over urban citizens shrinks dramatically, even to negative, after including the average income of their rural peers.Nevertheless, the prospect of upward mobility hypothesis is not supported: the average income of other urban workers shows no significant influence, and it may not result from the depressing effect of the prospect of upward mobility.

The Welfare Is Ours: Rural-to-Urban Migration and Domestic Welfare Chauvinism in Urban China

Investigating Social Welfare Change in Urban Village Transformation: A Rural Migrant Perspective

Home and Away: Chinese Migrant Workers Between Two Worlds

Urban Citizenship of Rural Migrants in Reform-Era China

Acquired but Unvested Welfare Rights: Migration and Entitlement Barriers in Reform-Era China

The Welfare Implications of Internal Migration Restrictions: Evidence from China

Are All Migrants Really Worse off in Urban Labour Markets? New Empirical Evidence from China

Does public rental housing foster social ties? A study of the everyday social lives of rural migrants in Chongqing, China

Association between Hometown Landholdings and Housing Quality of Rural Migrants in Urban Areas: Evidence from China

COVID-19 and Social Inequality in China: the Local–migrant Divide and the Limits of Social Protections in a Pandemic

Attitudes Towards Rural Migrants and Their Influence on Return Migration in China

Social Services Utilization, Land Tenure Arrangements, And Self-Identification Among Rural Migrants In China

MIGRANTS, URBAN VILLAGES, AND COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS: A CASE OF GUANGZHOU, CHINA

The Chinese Welfare State in Transition: 1988–2007

Discrimination against rural-to-urban migrants: the role of the hukou system in China.

Differential Acculturation: A Study of Well-Being Differences in Intergenerational Social Mobility Between Rural and Urban China

Subjective social integration and its spatially varying determinants of rural-to-urban migrants among Chinese cities

On the Origins of Welfare Stigma: Comparing Two Social Assistance Schemes in Rural China

Absolute Income, Income Inequality and the Subjective Well-Being of Migrant Workers in China: Toward an Understanding of the Relationship and Its Psychological Mechanisms

Relative Income and Subjective Well-Being: Examining Multiple Reference Groups of Rural-to-Urban Migrant Workers in China

Anti-urbanization and Rural Development: Evidence from Return Migrants in China