Abstract:After the Meiji Restoration in 1868, Japan rapidly industrialized, greatly raising its level of economic productivity. However, the peasants were kept in a state of hunger under a semifeudal agricultural system. How should this semi-feudality be understood? About this question arose a debate among Japanese Marxists in prewar Japan: the Debate on Japanese Capitalism. This article examines the methodologies of three analysists of Japanese capitalism focusing on the level of abstraction of the analysis of capitalism, whose ideas were derived from Hegel’s Logic and Marx’s methodology of downward analysis and upward development: Moritarō Yamada of Kōzaha, Itsurō Sakisaka of Rōnōha, and Kōzō Uno, who distanced himself from both sides. Uno criticized Yamada and Sakisaka for directly analyzing a particular Japanese capitalism with a highly general theory such as Capital, and proposed the Three-Stage Theory: the Pure Theory, which is based on the assumption of a pure capitalism, such as Marx’s Capital; the Stage Theory, which clarifies the historical developmental stage of capitalism, such as Lenin’s Imperialism (1917); and the Empirical Analysis, which analyzes capitalism in each country at a given time. However, Uno’s main concern was to analyze Japanese capitalism in the Stage Theory, doing little to further advance it in the Empirical Analysis. Therefore, this article divided the Empirical Analysis into two levels of abstraction: the domain of theoretical construction of Japanese Capitalism, such as Lenin’s Development of Capitalism in Russia (1899), and of data analysis of specific conditions of Japanese capitalism, such as Engels’ The Condition of the Working Class in England (1844), and thus proposed the Four-Stage Theory. It is a hypothesis for complementing Uno’s Three-Stage Theory, which should be further developed by data. Finally, such methodological consideration for analyzing capitalism is applicable to non-Japanese capitalist societies.

Functions of Millenarism in Premodern Japanese Literature

Literary canon and national identity: The Tale of Genji in Meiji Japan

Literature and Modern Japanese Urbanism: Features of the Traditional Worldview in a Modern Space

Public Speaking and Serialized Novels: Kōdan and Social Movements in Early Meiji Tokyo

Science across the Meiji divide: Vernacular literary genres as vectors of science in modern Japan

Reflection of the Japanese Consciousness and Worldview in the Context of Globalization in the Novels of Haruki Murakami

Changes in Social Commitment in The Works of Haruki Murakami

Questioning western universality: Sōseki's Theory of Literature and his novel Kusamakura

Spiritualism and modernism in the work of Kawabata Yasunari

A Genealogy of Literal Translation in Modern Japan

Marxism and the Debate on the Transition to Capitalism in Prewar Japan

Dominant Forms and Marginal Translations: Re-reading the Emergence of the Novel in Nineteenth-Century Japan

Apuleius in Meiji Japan: The Golden Ass as an Educational and Reformatory Novel

Individualizing Japan: searching for its origin in first modernity

Understanding Japanese society through life after death

The Popularity and Influence of Chinese Morality Book in Modern Japan Focusing on Toju Nakae's Religious Outlook

Perspectives on the Japanese new religion Tenrikyō: From global expansion to the development of a distinct “Tenri culture”

Sociology of ritual and narrative as post-Western sociology: from the perspective of Confucianism and Nativism in the Edo period of Japan

Global Modernism: The Literary Language of the Japanese, Shanghainese, and Taiwanese New Sensationalist Schools

Moral Education in Japan