To see or not to see: a cross‐sectional study suggesting lack of bias towards authors in the peer‐review process

H. Daou,L. Gu,S.R. Lipner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20607
IF: 11.113
2021-09-02
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Scientific manuscript peer review has a 300-year history, but formal analysis of validity of peer review began in the late 20th century.1 Peer review bias was suggested in the 1980s,2 but in a 1997 congress,2 no significant reviewer bias was detected.3 Within dermatology, the peer review process has hardly been studied. The majority of dermatology journals have a single-blind (SB) peer review process, with reviewers informed of author identity, but authors unaware of reviewers'. Few journals have a double-blind (DB) process, such that neither authors nor reviewers are aware of identity. We conducted a cross-sectional study investigating associations between peer review blinding and author publication metrics.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?