Preclinical Evaluation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Overexpressing MicroRNA-126 to Treat Critical Limb Ischemia

Pegah Nammian,Seyedeh-Leili Asadi-Yousefabad,Sajad Daneshi,Jafar Fallahi,Seyed Mohammad Bagher Tabei,Vahid Razban
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-653222/v1
2021-06-30
Abstract:Abstract Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) considered as the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD), and characterized by ischemic rest pain and non-healing ulcers. CLI being associated with a high risk of major amputation, cardiovascular events and death. Current therapy for CLI are surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy or limb amputation (for patients with no treatment options). Neovasculogenesis induced by stem cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy is a promising approach to treat CLI. But this method of treatment faces challenges that reduce its effectiveness, such as: MSCs survival and paracrine secretion. MicroRNAs are post transcriptional regulatory molecules that regulate many biological processes including VEGF pathway. Therefore, microRNAs could be used to increase viability and angiogenic potential of MSCs. This study was conducted to reinforce and increase the angiogenic potential of BM-MSCs by using microRNA-126 and evaluate the effect of this stem cell gene therapy on treatment of ischemic tissues in CLI mouse models. Results: Our cellular, molecular and functional tests indicated that during 28 days after transplantation, BM-MSCs and virus groups had an enhancing effect on angiogenesis. BM-MSCs miR-126 group had remarkable effect on endothelial cell migration, muscle restructure, functional improvements and neovascularization in ischemic tissues and led to more effective treatment. On the other hand, miR-126 could increase paracrine secretion of BM-MSCs. Additionally, in vivo evaluation showed that miR-126 could increase BM-MSCs survival and paracrine secretion of angiogenic factors such as VEGF, and led to remarkable functional improvements and neovascularization in ischemic tissues. Conclusion: According to the obtained results, it could concluded that combination of BM-MSCs and miR-126 leads to more effective recovery from critical limb ischemia compared to using them alone. In fact, miR-126 can be used as a strong modifier to reinforce the angiogenic potential of BM-MSCs, leading to more effective treatment for CLI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?