Abstract:Abstract Academic resilience refers to students’ capacity to perform highly despite a disadvantaged background. Although most studies using international large-scale assessment (ILSA) data defined academic resilience with two criteria, student background and achievement, their conceptualizations and operationalizations varied substantially. In a systematic review, we identified 20 ILSA studies applying different criteria, different approaches to setting thresholds (the same fixed ones across countries or relative country-specific ones), and different threshold levels. Our study on the validity of these differences and how they affected the composition of academically resilient students revealed that the classification depended heavily on the threshold applied. When a fixed background threshold was applied, the classification was likely to be affected by the developmental state of a country. This could result in an overestimation of the proportions of academically resilient students in some countries while an underestimation in others. Furthermore, compared to the application of a social or economic capital indication, applying a cultural capital indicator may lead to lower shares of disadvantaged students classified as academically resilient. The composition of academically resilient students varied significantly by gender and language depending on which indicator of human capital or which thresholds were applied reflecting underlying societal characteristics. Conclusions drawn from such different results depending on the specific conceptualizations and operationalizations would vary greatly. Finally, our study utilizing PISA 2015 data from three countries representing diverse cultures and performance levels revealed that a stronger sense of belonging to a school significantly increased the chances to be classified as academically resilient in Peru, but not in Norway or Hong Kong. In contrast, absence from school was significantly associated with academic resilience in Norway and Hong Kong, but not in Peru.

Between vulnerability and resilience: A contextualist picture of protective epistemic character traits

Innovating resilience promotion: Integrating cultural practices, social ecologies and development-sensitive conceptual strategies for advancing child well-being

The three axioms of resilience

The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct.

What we have changed our minds about: Part 1. Borderline personality disorder as a limitation of resilience

Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology From Individuals to Societies

Contributions to inclusive and impactful development and psychopathology science: interrogating ecology-linked vulnerability and resilience opportunities

Networking trait resilience: Unifying fragmented trait resilience systems from an ecological systems theory perspective

Preschool Teachers’ Perception on the Development and Promotion of Resilience in Young Children at Kindergarten

What we have changed our minds about: Part 2. Borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust and the developmental significance of social communication

Understanding adaptive responses to adversity: Introduction to the special issue on rethinking resilience and posttraumatic growth.

Modelling resilience in adolescence and adversity: a novel framework to inform research and practice

Epistemic Trust: a Keyword for Contemporary Clinical Practice and Psychopathology

Reflections on resilience

Self‐worth Protection: review and implications for the classroom

Academic resilience: underlying norms and validity of definitions

Creating a resilient pedagogy: Character strengths intervention for aspiring educators

Resilience in Development and Psychopathology: Multisystem Perspectives

Character and resilience in English education policy: social mobility, self-governance and biopolitics

Resilience in Development

The Concept Of Resiliency: How Adverse Events Can Influence Protective And Risk Factors Of Resiliency