Premature rupture of membranes in full-term pregnancy: controversial issues in obstetric management

I.V. Ignatko,A.A. Churganova,A.M. Rodionova,Sh.Sh. Baybulatova,T.M. Silaeva,A.D. Megrabyan,Yu.V. Denisova,,,,,,,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2021-6-120-128
2021-01-01
Abstract:Premature rupture of membranes is a complication of pregnancy, which is developed in full-term in 8% of cases. Spontaneous labor usually occurs within the next 24 hours, but the latency period may be longer. A prolonged anhydrous period is associated with a significantly increased risk of infection and adverse perinatal outcomes, including early-onset neonatal sepsis, with mortality rates approaching 50% in the absence of treatment. The problem of choosing pregnancy management strategy is highly controversial: conservative treatment increases the risk of chorioamnionitis and endometritis, while invasive approach may lead to complications associated with surgical intervention and fetal dysmaturity. The maximum duration of the latency period after which to proceed to labor induction is under discussion. The article analyzes the current data on the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy, evaluates the possibility of outpatient management of low-risk pregnant women using conservative treatment, the need for antibiotic prophylaxis, and the effectiveness of uterotonics. The data were searched in the PubMed digital library, Clinical Trials database, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. A review of the literature showed that active conservative treatment followed by the induction of labor with oxytocin is the most appropriate, with the final choice of management to be left to the pregnant woman in case of low-risk obstetric and perinatal complications. Key words: premature rupture of membranes, full-term pregnancy, labor induction, chorioamnionitis, antibiotic prophylaxis, mifepristone
What problem does this paper attempt to address?