ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL CONTENT OF THE NATIONAL CYBERSECURITY SYSTEM AS A COMPONENT OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM OF UKRAINE

I V Diorditsa,I. V. Diorditsa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/392117
2021-03-04
Actual problems of native jurisprudence
Abstract:The article offers for consideration the author's results of determining the conceptual provisions of the administrative and legal content of the national cybersecurity system as a component of the national security system of Ukraine. The content of the current state of state policy in the field of formation of the cybersecurity system is considered. Theoretical and practical aspects of organizational support of the cybersecurity system are analyzed. General and special subjects of cybersecurity are identified. The own vision of the following main elements in the system of cyber security of Ukraine (according to the main types of threats to cybersecurity) is proposed: 1) national system of combating cybercrime; 2) national system for combating cyberterrorism; 3) a nationwide system for combating cyber espionage; 4) national system of counteraction to information wars and new complex types of threats, including hybrid wars; 5) national system of cyber protection of national critical infrastructure. The administrative and legal understanding of the concept of national cybersecurity system is established – a set of special subjects of the national cybersecurity system, means and methods used by them, as well as a set of relevant interconnected information, cybernetic, legal, organizational, technical and strategic communications measures carried out by them. It is concluded that since the national security system is multicomponent, there is a need for a special subsystem, the purpose of which would be to ensure the functioning and development of this system, ie to ensure the viability of its system-forming elements, including national interests, society, state. Such a system is the national security system, as well as the national cybersecurity system. These factors confirm the conclusion that the national cybersecurity system is considered not only as a subsystem of the state information policy, but also primarily as a component of the national security system of Ukraine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?