Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) governance is anticipated to have a transformative impact on humanity which has prompted researchers to analyze its implementation and use to ensure that the technology advances ethically and is beneficial for society. Though countries have begun to develop governance initiatives to regulate AI, the number of emerging AI regimes with an established structure is still relatively low. Meanwhile, the technology is advancing rapidly and has already caused harm inequitably to underrepresented communities. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish robust governance to mitigate the issues and risks attendant when deploying AI.While numerous ethics, principles, and structures have been recommended, this article intends to address the policy lag by providing policymakers with a simple and compelling AI governance framework that situates AI principles as the guiding baseline for developing and evaluating policies. Rather than devising new policy recommendations, the most recent (at the time of writing) and comprehensive governance documents from China, the European Union, and the United States were systematically selected, and examined in a comparative analysis to study how the three regimes address AI principles. Based on the comparative analysis, the most comprehensive and effective recommendations were selected to produce seven broad policy recommendations. The governance framework and recommendations are intentionally broad so that they can be adapted to adequately address AI principles across diverse contexts, encouraging the implementation of AI principles, increasing the likelihood of beneficial AI, and reducing the risks and harms associated with the technology. Nevertheless, the recommendations provided should not be considered exhaustive as the technology has an immense reach and new AI governance initiatives are developing continuously in this growth period in AI governance. It is thus essential for policymakers to survey the most current and relevant governance landscape to identify the best practices that are suitable for their specific context and need.

Categorization and eccentricity of AI risks: a comparative study of the global AI guidelines

AI Risk Categorization Decoded (AIR 2024): From Government Regulations to Corporate Policies

Taking AI risks seriously: a new assessment model for the AI Act

An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks

AI-Driven Risk Management for Sustainable Enterprise Development: A Review of Key Risks

Quantitative AI Risk Assessments: Opportunities and Challenges

Guidelines for Risk Evaluation in Artificial Intelligence Applications

Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making

Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems

Bridging the Global Divide in AI Regulation: A Proposal for a Contextual, Coherent, and Commensurable Framework

Towards Concrete and Connected AI Risk Assessment (C$^2$AIRA): A Systematic Mapping Study

A Comprehensive Review and Systematic Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Regulation Policies

Tackling problems, harvesting benefits -- A systematic review of the regulatory debate around AI

Risk assessment at AGI companies: A review of popular risk assessment techniques from other safety-critical industries

A principled governance for emerging AI regimes: lessons from China, the European Union, and the United States

Regulating artificial intelligence: Proposal for a global solution

Assessing the State of AI Policy

Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework

Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: recognizing the risks

Examining the Differential Risk from High-level Artificial Intelligence and the Question of Control

The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously