The clinical significance of treatment gains resulting from exposure-based interventions for agoraphobia: A reanalysis of outcome data

Neil S. Jacobson,Leanne Wilson,Cheryl Tupper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(88)80022-4

IF: 4.796

1988-01-01

Behavior Therapy

Abstract:We reanalyzed outcome data from a series of studies investigating the efficacy of exposure-based treatments for agoraphobia. Applying statistical criteria developed by Jacobson, Follette, and Revenstorf (1984) to determine clinically significant change whenever possible, the reanalysis of 11 data sets yielded an average improvement rate across all data sets of 58%. The percentages of clinets who actually recovered in response to exposure-based treatments was considerably lower: Only 27% of the clients ended therapy with little or no residual agoraphobic behavior. Generally, the treatment gains that were made were maintained over the course of various follow-up periods. Discussion focused on methodological issues such as criteria for good outcome measures and the pros and cons of standardized versus a priori measures of clinical significance, clinical issues involving the implications of these findings, and suggestions in the literature for how to increase treatment efficacy.

psychology, clinical,psychiatry