Abstract:Background: The five-factor model of personality, as quantified using instruments such as the Big Five Inventory, consists of broad personality domains including Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism (emotional instability), and Openness. Such instruments typically include >40 items. However, instruments with many items can be unwieldly and a cause of measurement error in clinical and cohort studies where multiple scales are sequenced. Conversely, established 5- and 10-item versions of the Big Five Inventory have poor reliability. Here, we developed and validated an abbreviated 18-item Big Five Inventory that balances efficiency, reliability and sensitivity. Method: We analysed three datasets (N = 59,797, N = 21,177, and N = 87,983) from individuals who participated in the online Great British Intelligence Test (GBIT) study, a collaborative citizen science project with BBC2 Horizon. We applied factor analyses (FA), predictive normative modelling, and one-sample t-tests to validate the 18-item version of the Big Five and to investigate its associations with psychiatric and neurological conditions. Results: The 18-item version of the Big Five Inventory had higher validity and retest reliability compared to the other previously shortened versions in the literature, with comparable demographic associations to the full Big Five Inventory. It exhibited strong (i.e. large effect size) associations with psychiatric conditions, and moderate (small-medium) associations with neurological conditions. Neuroticism (emotional instability) was substantially higher in all psychiatric conditions, whereas Conscientiousness, Openness and Extraversion showed differential associations across conditions. Conclusion: The newly validated 18-item version of the Big Five provides a convenient means of measuring personality traits that is suitable for deployment in a range of studies. It retains psychometric structure, retest reliability and clinical-group sensitivity, as compared to the full original scale.

Item subtlety and face validity in personality assessment.

Testing the Measurement Equivalence of Personality Adjective Items Across Cultures

Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity

Assessing the Validity of the Semantic Differential Portion of the Apperceptive Personality Test

A less evaluative measure of Big Five personality: Comparison of structure and criterion validity

Evaluating a Brief Big Five Personality Test in a Diverse Chinese Sample: The Role of Midpoint Designs and Reversely-Worded Items

Reliability and External Validity of Personality Test Scores: The Role of Person and Item Error.

Use of subtle and obvious scales to detect faking on the MCMI-II

Validating a brief measure of four facets of social evaluation

Measurement specificity with modern methods: Using dimensions, facets, and items from personality assessments to predict performance.

The Relation Between Item Format and the Structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory

The More Contextualized, the More Valid: Effects of Contextualization Strategies on Forced-choice Measurement

Adjectives vs. Statements in Forced Choice and Likert Item Types: Which Is More Resistant to Impression Management in Personality Assessment?

A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The dirty dozen and short dark triad.

Timidity as a Response Style to Psychological Questionnaires

Personality Assessment in the Diagnostic Manuals: On Mindfulness, Multiple Methods, and Test Score Discontinuities

The dominance of introspective measures and what this implies: The example of environmental attitude

A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires

Normalizing the Use of Single-Item Measures: Validation of the Single-Item Compendium for Organizational Psychology

Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3)

Validation of an abbreviated Big Five personality inventory at large population scale: Psychometric structure and associations with common psychiatric and neurological disorders