Abstract:One of the main outstanding problems in keyword mnemotechnics is whether this technique is more effective when the subjects generate their own keywords, or when the keywords are supplied by the experimenter. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. An alternative method has recently been suggested, in which the keywords are generated by the subjects' peers. In the present study we aimed to investigate whether immediate or delayed recall are affected by keyword generation method (experimenter or peer generation). We also aimed to determine whether the method of keyword generation affects imaging capacity as evaluated by questionnaires or spatial tests. A total of 377 secondary-school students were selected and divided into four groups. All subjects were presented with 30 Latin words. Additionally, the subjects in Group 1 were presented with bizarre images, while the subjects of Group 2 were presented with normal images, in both cases representing the keywords selected by peers as interacting with the Latin words. The subjects in Groups 3 and 4 were likewise presented with normal or bizarre images, respectively, but representing the keywords selected by the experimenters. The subjects' imaging capacity was evaluated by means of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) and the Spatial Test of Primary Mental Abilities (ST-PMA). The results were analysed by multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with three factors (ST-PMA imaging capacity, 2 levels; VVIQ imaging capacity, 2 levels; and mnemotechnic method, 4 levels) and dependent variables immediate recall and delayed recall. All three factors influenced recall. Subsequent univariate analyses of variance indicated that subjects with high ST-PMA score and subjects with high VVIQ score showed better immediate and delayed recall than subjects with low ST-PMA score and subjects with low VVIQ score. Mnemotechnic method (i.e. whether keywords are generated by the experimenter or by peers) significantly affected immediate recall but not delayed recall.

Mnemotechnics: Some limitations of the mnemonic keyword method for the study of foreign language vocabulary.

An Application of the Mnemonic Keyword Method to the Acquisition of a Russian Vocabulary. Psychology and Education Series, Technical Report No. 237.

Presentation of keywords by means of interactive drawings

The Role of Visual Cues in the Keyword Method: Assessing Variations of the Mnemonic Approach in L2 Vocabulary Learning

The facilitative effect of the keyword mnemonic on L2 vocabulary retrieval practice

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

KEYWORD MNEMONIC IN BOOSTING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MEMORIZATION FOR YOUNG LEARNERS LEVEL

The Use of Mnemonic Method and Its Implications for Arabic Learning

The Effect of Mnemonic Key-letters Method on Chinese Children at Risk in English Vocabulary Learning

The Use of Mnemonics to Minimize the Interfering Effects of Teaching New Words in Semantic Sets to Learners of English as a Foreign Language

The effectiveness of combining the keyword mnemonic with retrieval practice on L2 vocabulary learning in Taiwanese EFL classes

Experimental Researches into Effect ofMnemonic Key-letters Method on English Vocabulary Acquistion

A Mixed-Methods Investigation of the Effectiveness and Perceptions of Learning English Collocations Using the Keyword Method and the Rote Learning Method

SmartPhone: Exploring Keyword Mnemonic with Auto-generated Verbal and Visual Cues

INPUT, INTAKE, AND RETENTION

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A KEYWORD METHOD IN ACQUIRING ENGLISH WORDS

Visual Mnemonic Technique : An Effective Learning Strategy

Exploring Automated Keyword Mnemonics Generation with Large Language Models via Overgenerate-and-Rank

Examining the influence of list composition on the mnemonic benefit of errorful generation

The Effectiveness of Mnemonic Devices for ESL Vocabulary Retention

A Preliminary Research into the Impeding Factors of the Key-letter Method for the Efficacy of the Memory of English Vocabulary