Abstract:Purpose: Patient-to-image registration is critical to providing surgeons with reliable guidance information in the application of image-guided neurosurgery systems. The conventional point-matching registration method, which is based on skin markers, requires expensive and time-consuming logistic support. Surface-matching registration with facial surface scans is an alternative method, but the registration accuracy is unstable and the error in the more posterior parts of the head is usually large because the scan range is limited. This study proposes a new surface-matching method using a portable 3D scanner to acquire a point cloud of the entire head to perform the patient-to-image registration.Methods: A new method for transforming the scan points from the device space into the patient space without calibration and tracking was developed. Five positioning targets were attached on a reference star, and their coordinates in the patient space were measured prior. During registration, the authors moved the scanner around the head to scan its entire surface as well as the positioning targets, and the scanner generated a unique point cloud in the device space. The coordinates of the positioning targets in the device space were automatically detected by the scanner, and a spatial transformation from the device space to the patient space could be calculated by registering them to their coordinates in the patient space that had been measured prior. A three-step registration algorithm was then used to register the patient space to the image space. The authors evaluated their method on a rigid head phantom and an elastic head phantom to verify its practicality and to calculate the target registration error (TRE) in different regions of the head phantoms. The authors also conducted an experiment with a real patient's data to test the feasibility of their method in the clinical environment.Results: In the phantom experiments, the mean fiducial registration error between the device space and the patient space, the mean surface registration error, and the mean TRE of 15 targets on the surface of each phantom were 0.34 +/- 0.01 mm and 0.33 +/- 0.02 mm, 1.17 +/- 0.02 mm and 1.34 +/- 0.10 mm, and 1.06 +/- 0.11 mm and 1.48 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively. When grouping the targets according to their positions on the head, high accuracy was achieved in all parts of the head, and the TREs were similar across different regions. The authors compared their method with the current surface registration methods that use only a part of the facial surface on the elastic phantom, and the mean TRE of 15 targets was 1.48 +/- 0.21 mm and 1.98 +/- 0.53 mm, respectively. In a clinical experiment, the mean TRE of seven targets on the patient's head surface was 1.92 +/- 0.18 mm, which was sufficient to meet clinical requirements.Conclusions: The proposed surface-matching registration method provides sufficient registration accuracy even in the posterior area of the head. The 3D point cloud of the entire head, including the facial surface and the back of the head, can be easily acquired using a portable 3D scanner. The scanner does not need to be calibrated prior or tracked by the optical tracking system during scanning. (C) 2014 Author(s).

Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 2: management of multiple face scans and alignment predictability.

Chairside virtual patient protocol. Part 3: In vitro accuracy of a digital facebow.

Reliability and Reproducibility of Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Cephalometrics Using Different Placement Methods.

Trueness of One Stationary and Two Mobile Systems for Three-Dimensional Facial Scanning

Does the choice of the reference model affect the results of 3D-3D superimposition procedure? A comparison of different protocols for personal identification

A New Markerless Patient-To-Image Registration Method Using A Portable 3d Scanner

Comparison of the Registration Methods for the Three-Dimensional Facial Scans Applied to the Design of Full-Arch Implant Supported Restoration

Virtual Facial Reconstruction Based on Accurate Registration and Fusion of 3D Facial and MSCT Scans

The accuracy (trueness and precision) of Bellus3DARC-7 and an in-vivo analysis of intra and inter-examiner reliability of digital and manual anthropometry

Smartphone-Based Facial Scanning as a Viable Tool for Facially Driven Orthodontics?

Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method

The Validity of a Smartphone-Based Method for Acquiring 3D Images of the Face

Digital Human: Three-dimentional face model reconstruction based on Hifi3dface model with clinical two-dimentional photos

Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system

Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging

Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy.

Impact of the superimposition methods on accuracy analyses in maxillary complete-arch digital implant investigation

One Step before 3D Printing—Evaluation of Imaging Software Accuracy for 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Mandible: A Comparative Study Using a Surface-to-Surface Matching Technique

Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dmd and Bellus3D Facial Scanning Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry.

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

[Preliminary Evaluation of the Trueness of 5 Chairside 3D Facial Scanning Techniques].