Abstract:Many threatened species suffer from a lack of conservation attention compared to others. Prioritisation of funding, research and conservation efforts seem to be driven by reasons beyond conservation need. This could be due to a 'beauty bias', whereby aesthetically pleasing species receive more attention. We examined how editing an image to increase a species' aesthetic appeal may impact donation choices and public attitude towards that species. We posed two research questions; first, 'do people make different donation choices when they see original images of a species compared to when they see images of the same species that have been edited to match aesthetic preferences?' Using hypothetical donation experiments, we asked respondents to allocate funds to the conservation of three pictured species, one 'aesthetically appealing', one 'aesthetically unappealing', and one whose image was either edited to reflect common aesthetic preferences or left unedited. Our findings suggest that images edited to make an animal more visually appealing tend to receive higher hypothetical donation amounts than original images. We also posed a second research question; 'How do people of varying conservation expertise respond to original versus edited images of wildlife?' To investigate this, we ran three focus groups with individuals unfamiliar with our test species, those familiar with two or more of our test species, and with conservation professionals, which showed mixed reactions both within and between groups. Focus group participants with less conservation expertise noted that edited images often seemed 'cuter' than unedited images, and were more likely to compare them to cartoon characters. Participants with more conservation expertise and species familiarity reported greater empathy towards unedited images, and noted that the edited images prompted an 'uncanny valley' response, highlighting the need for further scrutiny in how photo editing might be used in conservation messaging. Our findings support the beauty bias hypothesis and highlight that decisions on conservation support should acknowledge that less aesthetically pleasing species are disadvantaged in public attention and funding. In addition, the findings highlight the role of conservation expertise in impacting viewer reactions, as well as the ethical implications of editing images of wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

The Effect of Animal Bipedal Posture on Perceived Cuteness, Fear, and Willingness to Protect Them

Beauty ranking of mammalian species kept in the Prague Zoo: does beauty of animals increase the respondents’ willingness to protect them?

Human Positioning in Close-Encounter Photographs and the Effect on Public Perceptions of Zoo Animals

Detecting a Stalker: The Effect of Body Posture, Gaze Direction, and Camouflage Pattern on Predator Detection

The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions

Stereotypes, emotions, and behaviors associated with animals: A causal test of the stereotype content model and BIAS map

"It's so Cute I Could Crush It!": Understanding Neural Mechanisms of Cute Aggression

Humankind’s Best Friend vs. Humankind’s Best Food: Perceptions of Identifiable Dog vs. Pig Victims

Attention Towards Pupil Size in Humans and Bonobos (Pan paniscus)

Using photo editing to understand the impact of species aesthetics on support for conservation

Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics

Perception of Cats: Assessing the Differences Between Videos and Still Pictures on Adoptability and Associated Characteristics

Too anthropomorphized to keep distance: The role of social psychological distance on meat inclinations

I am Homo Sapien: Perceptions of Evolutionary Theory, Animal Identity, and Human–Animal Relationships Among US Law and Policy Students

Influence of human emotions on conservation attitudes toward relevant wildlife species in El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

Giving farm animals a name and a face: Eliciting animal advocacy among omnivores using the identifiable victim effect

Implicit measures of anthropomorphism: affective priming and recognition of apparent animal emotions

Shared pattern of face preferences in human infants and pet dogs

Species identity cues in animal communication

Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation

Personality influences habituation behaviour in ungulates