Group cohesiveness, social norms, and bystander intervention.

Gregory K. Rutkowski,Charles L. Gruder,Daniel Romer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.545
IF: 8.46
1983-01-01
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Abstract:Previous research suggests that the larger a group of bystanders is, the less likely any one bystander is to offer a victim help in an emergency. Nearly all of this research has been conducted with unacquainted bystanders, and thus, an important group characteristic––cohesiveness––may have been held at a low level. Two studies with 192 male undergraduates assessed the impact of group cohesiveness on the bystander effect. Study 1 found support for the hypothesis that group size inhibits helping in low-cohesive groups but facilitates helping in high-cohesive groups. Study 2 found support for the hypothesis that the effects of cohesiveness on bystander intervention depend on the salience of the social-responsibility norm: Cohesiveness facilitated helping more when the social-responsibility norm was salient than when it was not. Thus, group cohesiveness is a theoretically critical variable for understanding bystander effect. Results suggest that the effects of group and situation variables depend on the group's meaning to the individual. (29 ref)
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?