Comparison between 24‐h proteinuria, urinary protein/creatinine ratio and dipstick test in patients with nephropathy: Patterns of proteinuria in dipstick‐negative patients

M. Gai,D. Motta,S. Giunti,F. Fop,S. Masini,E. Mezza,G. P. Segoloni,G. Lanfranco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510600608563
2006-01-01
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Three main tests are commonly employed for the measurement of proteinuria: the dipstick test, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio (P/C) and the 24-h urine collection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between these methods, comparing linear regression and ROC curve data.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 297 consecutive outpatients with different renal diseases were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria was considered the reference test.RESULTS: A high degree of correlation was observed between all the tests (p<0.0001), the highest regression coefficient being between 24-h proteinuria and P/C (R=0.82), and the lowest between P/C and the dipstick test (R=0.72). The dipstick test failed to detect pathological proteinuria in 94 patients (31.6%). Therefore, in these subjects, the patterns of proteinuria were assessed by immunofixation and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) electrophoresis.CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support the use of urinary P/C for the detection of proteinuria, at least in nephrology units, where the prevalence of proteinuria is likely to be high.
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?