The group polarization phenomenon.

David G. Myers,Helmut Lamm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602
IF: 22.4
1976-01-01
Psychological Bulletin
Abstract:Experiments exploring the effects of group discussion on attitudes, jury decisions, ethical decisions, judgments, person perceptions, negotiations, and risk taking (other than the choice-dilemmas task) are generally consistent with a "group polarization" hypothesis, derived from the risky-shift literature. Recent attempts to explain the phenomenon fall mostly into 1 of 3 theoretical approaches: (a) group decision rules, especially majority rule (which is contradicted by available data); (b) interpersonal comparisons (for which there is mixed support); and (c) informational influence (for which there is strong support). A conceptual scheme is presented which integrates the latter 2 viewpoints and suggests how attitudes develop in a social context. (41/2 p ref)
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?