Abstract:Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is a top option to both decrease CO2 emissions and remove CO2 currently in the atmosphere. BECCS requires that we can sustainably produce biomass without impacting the capacity for food and feed production. We modeled yield potential on U.S. marginal land for three promising perennial biomass crops: Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane. Under current (2000–2014) and forecasted future (2036–2050) conditions we optimized the spatial distribution of these three crops for yield potential. The predicted biomasses from these crops on marginal land are estimated to offset about 11% of the current U.S. CO2 emissions. Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is considered one of the top options for both offsetting CO2 emissions and removing atmospheric CO2. BECCS requires using limited land resources efficiently while ensuring minimal adverse impacts on the delicate food‐energy‐water nexus. Perennial C4 biomass crops are productive on marginal land under low‐input conditions avoiding conflict with food and feed crops. The eastern half of the contiguous U.S. contains a large amount of marginal land, which is not economically viable for food production and liable to wind and water erosion under annual cultivation. However, this land is suitable for geological CO2 storage and perennial crop growth. Given the climate variation across the region, three perennials are major contenders for planting. The yield potential and stability of Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane across the region were compared to select which would perform best under the recent (2000–2014) and future (2036–2050) climates. Miscanthus performed best in the Midwest, switchgrass in the Northeast and energycane in the Southeast. On average, Miscanthus yield decreased from present 19.1 t/ha to future 16.8 t/ha; switchgrass yield from 3.5 to 2.4 t/ha; and energycane yield increased from 14 to 15 t/ha. Future yield stability decreased in the region with higher predicted drought stress. Combined, these crops could produce 0.6–0.62 billion tonnes biomass per year for the present and future. Using the biomass for power generation with CCS would capture 703–726 million tonnes of atmospheric CO2 per year, which would offset about 11% of current total U.S. emission. Further, this biomass approximates the net primary CO2 productivity of two times the current baseline productivity of existing vegetation, suggesting a huge potential for BECCS. Beyond BECCS, C4 perennial grasses could also increase soil carbon and provide biomass for emerging industries developing replacements for non‐renewable products including plastics and building materials.

Global bioenergy with carbon capture and storage potential is largely constrained by sustainable irrigation

Can bioenergy carbon capture and storage aggravate global water crisis?

Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios

Increased precipitation over land due to climate feedback of large-scale bioenergy cultivation

Temperature Changes Induced by Biogeochemical and Biophysical Effects of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation

Hydrological limits to carbon capture and storage

Bioenergy Crops for Low Warming Targets Require Half of the Present Agricultural Fertilizer Use

Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios

Biomass yield potential on U.S. marginal land and its contribution to reach net‐zero emission

A Review of Influencing Factors for Policy Interventions in the Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Global cooling induced by biophysical effects of bioenergy crop cultivation

Delayed Use of Bioenergy Crops Might Threaten Climate and Food Security.

Simulated Climate Effects of Desert Irrigation Geoengineering

Water use in a sustainable net zero energy system: what are the implications of employing bioenergy with carbon capture and storage?

Climate vs Energy Security: Quantifying the Trade-offs of BECCS Deployment and Overcoming Opportunity Costs on Set-Aside Land

Global energy use and carbon emissions from irrigated agriculture

The implications for energy crops under China's climate change challenges

Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): Viability and Potential

Global implications of crop‐based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity

Water Availability May Not Restrict the Implementation of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage Technology: Evidence from China's Electric Power Sector

Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis