Abstract:11022 Background: Gender disparities continue to remain under addressed in medicine. While prevalent in many forms, patient bias and perceptions toward their healthcare team can impact patient compliance and care. Health systems often gauge patient satisfaction with physicians and post these ratings online. It is possible that gender biases affect patient satisfaction scores and evaluations. Here, we assess the impact of physician gender on patient satisfaction scores and comments in an academic hematology/oncology practice. Methods: A retrospective mixed-method analysis was conducted from patient satisfaction scores and comments obtained between January and June of 2021. Patients were asked a series of three questions about their care. Patients’ response to the question, “How likely would you be to recommend this providers office to friends and family?”, was analyzed on a score of 0-10, with 10 being extremely likely and 0 being not at all likely. Patients were then asked for the primary reason for their scoring, in an open-ended format. Mixed-gender codified data was quantified from de-identified, de-gendered patient comments. To identify the differences in patient perception between male and female physicians, we specifically examined the data of positive and negative impressions of variables including professional behaviors, expertise, kindness, compassion, and interactions with ancillary staff amongst providers. Results: Patient satisfaction scores from 199 unique patients were reviewed; 140 (70.4%) were about male-identifying physicians while 59 (29.6%) were related to female-identifying physicians. The mean satisfaction score was 9.95 ± 0.29 for female physicians and 9.64 ± 1.38 for male physicians (p = 0.011). Of patients responding, 76 (38%) were male and 123 (63%) were female. Female physicians scored higher than male physicians for both male and female patients (10.0 ± 0 versus 9.65 ± 1.37 (p = 0.011) and 9.77 ± 0.60 versus 9.62 ± 1.40 (p = 0.011), respectively). Kindness and compassion were mentioned in 36% and 42% of all female physician scores, respectively, and in 29% and 33% of all male physician scores; these did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.587 and p = 0.257). 21% of all male physician scores positively mentioned physician expertise, compared to 15% of female physician scores; this also did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.434). Conclusions: Female physicians had a higher mean satisfaction score in patient evaluations than their male counterparts by both male and female patients. Numerically, more patient comments about female physicians mentioned kindness or compassion, while fewer mentioned expertise. This early work will be expanded to a larger dataset of evaluations in addition to further exploration of how female and male oncology providers are perceived by patients in multiple other categories.

Gender bias in resident evaluations: Natural language processing and competency evaluation

Chemoreception and the behavior of insects.

Using the morphology of the hominoid distal fibula to interpret arboreality in Australopithecus afarensis.

Evaluation of bias and gender/racial concordance based on sentiment analysis of narrative evaluations of clinical clerkships using natural language processing

Evaluation of the metabolic chiral inversion of d-selenomethionine in rats by stable isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Gender Bias in Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education: Review of the Literature

Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review

Does the Gender of Doctors Change a Patient's Perception?

Language Matters: Is There Gender Bias in Internal Medicine Grand Rounds Introductions?

Clinical Performance Evaluations of Third-Year Medical Students and Association With Student and Evaluator Gender

The impact of physician gender on patient satisfaction in an academic hematology/oncology practice.

Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Written Letters of Reference

Gender Differences in Work-Based Assessment Scores and Narrative Comments After Direct Observation

Evaluating the Impact of Gender, Race, and Training Year on Internal Medicine Residents' Experiences Across the United States

Gender Differences in Letters of Recommendations and Personal Statements for Neurotology Fellowship over 10 Years: A Deep Learning Linguistic Analysis

Analysis of narrative assessments of internal medicine resident performance: are there differences associated with gender or race and ethnicity?

Differences in Narrative Language in Evaluations of Medical Students by Gender and Under-represented Minority Status

[Schistosomiasis and viral hepatitides: a review].

PYRIDOXINE AS A GROWTH FACTOR FOR GRAPHIUM.

'Too male, too pale, too stale': a qualitative exploration of student experiences of gender bias within medical education

Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition