MSG-15: SUBA-Itraconazole versus Conventional Itraconazole in the Treatment of Endemic Mycoses - a multicenter, open-label, randomized comparative trial
Andrej Spec,George R Thompson,Marisa H Miceli,Justin Hayes,Laurie Proia,David McKinsey,Ana Belen Arauz,Kathleen Mullane,Jo-Ann Young,Gerald McGwin,Rachel McMullen,Tyler Plumley,Mary K Moore,Lee Ann McDowell,Carolynn Jones,Peter G Pappas,Marisa H Miceli³
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae010
2024-01-29
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Invasive fungal disease caused by dimorphic fungi is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Super bioavailability -itraconazole (SUBA-itra) is a novel antifungal agent with pharmacokinetic advantages over currently available formulations. In this prospective comparative study, we report the outcomes of patients with endemic fungal infections (histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and sporotrichosis). Methods This open-label randomized trial evaluated SUBA-itra's efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics compared to conventional itraconazole (c-itra) treatment for endemic fungal infections. An independent data review committee determined responses on treatment days 42 and 180. Results Eighty-eight patients were enrolled for IFD (SUBA-itra, n = 42; c-itra, n = 46) caused by Histoplasma (n = 51), Blastomyces (n = 18), Coccidioides (n = 13), and Sporothrix (n = 6). On day 42, clinical success was observed in SUBA-itra (69%) and c-itra (67%), and on day 180, clinical success was seen in SUBA-itra (60%) and 65% (c-itra). The SUBA-itra-treated patients exhibited less drug level variability at days 7 (p = 0.03) and 14 (p = 0.06) of randomized treatment. The concentrations of itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole were comparable between the two medications (p = 0.77 and 0.80, respectively). There was a trend for fewer adverse events (74% vs. 87%; p = 0.18) and serious adverse events (10% vs 26%; p = 0.06) in the SUBA-itra-treated patients compared to those receiving c-itra, respectively. Serious treatment adverse events were less common in SUBA-itra-treated patients (12% vs 50%, p = 0.0002). Conclusions SUBA-itra was bioequivalent, well-tolerated, and efficacious in treating endemic fungi with a more favorable safety profile than c-itra.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology