Abstract:This study provides an analytical solution of the Gini coefficient for Weibull distributions and uses real tree diameter at breast height data to clarify the relationship between the Gini coefficient and skewness. We propose a method for calculating the Gini coefficient and adjusting it for sample size under different distributions. Skewness, a measure of the asymmetry of a distribution, is frequently employed to reflect a biologically important property. Another statistic, the Gini coefficient (GC), originally used to measure economic inequality, has been validated in measuring the inequality of biological size distributions. Given that the GC and skewness control overlapping domains and interact with each other, researchers are perplexed by their relationship (varying with the biological [organ, tissue or cell] size distributions) and use both of them together to provide a more complete picture of the data. This study provides analytical forms of the GC for biological size distributions, including two‐parameter Weibull, uniform, normal, two‐parameter lognormal, gamma, three‐parameter Weibull, three‐parameter lognormal, and three‐parameter gamma distributions. Two empirical data sets and simulation data sets were used to clarify the GC–skewness relationships under different distributions. For the aforementioned distributions, the GC–skewness relationships can be divided into three types: (i) for a symmetrical distribution, the skewness is 0, and the GC ranges from 0.56 to 0.58 multiplied by the standard deviation divided by the mean irrespective of its relationship with the skewness; (ii) for an asymmetric distribution with a zero threshold, the GC is a monotonously increasing function of the skewness, and the two measures are equivalent; (iii) for an asymmetric distribution with a non‐zero threshold, the GC is determined by the skewness and an additional correction factor. We showed the differences in improving the accuracy of GC calculations based on small‐sample adjustments among various calculation methods, including the polygon (trapezoidal set) area method and the rotated Lorenz curve method. The present study turns the GC into a property of the distribution and offers a clear understanding for the GC–skewness relationship. This work provides insights into selecting and using the GC to measure inequality in ecological data, facilitating more accurate and meaningful analyses.

Detecting and displaying size bimodality: Kurtosis, skewness and bimodalizable distributions

Measures of kurtosis: inadmissible for asymmetric distributions?

Centre-free kurtosis orderings for asymmetric distributions

A New One Parameter Bimodal Skew Logistic Distribution and its Applications

Conditional volatility, skewness, and kurtosis: existence, persistence, and comovements

Which measures of skewness and kurtosis are best?

Sub-dimensional Mardia measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis

Inference via the Skewness-Kurtosis Set

A New Multimodal Modification of the Skew Family of Distributions: Properties and Applications to Medical and Environmental Data

Using the Box-Cox t distribution in GAMLSS to model skewness and kurtosis

THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SKEWNESS AND KURTOSIS

An analysis of multivariate measures of skewness and kurtosis of skew-elliptical distributions

The skewness and kurtosis of the product of two normally distributed random variables

On the Relationship Between the Gini Coefficient and Skewness

Developing flexible classes of distributions to account for both skewness and bimodality

Weighted skewness and kurtosis unbiased by sample size

Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation

Bounded Distributions place Limits on Skewness and Larger Moments

Omnibus tests of multinormality based on skewness and kurtosis

A method of generating multivariate non-normal random numbers with desired multivariate skewness and kurtosis