Abstract:The demand for residential aged care is increasing due to the ageing population. Optimising the design or adapting the physical environment of residential aged care facilities has the potential to influence quality of life, mood and function. To assess the effects of changes to the physical environment, which include alternative models of residential aged care such as a 'home‐like' model of care (where residents live in small living units) on quality of life, behaviour, mood and depression and function in older people living in residential aged care. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases and two trial registries were searched on 11 February 2021. Reference lists and grey literature sources were also searched. Non‐randomised trials, repeated measures or interrupted time series studies and controlled before‐after studies with a comparison group were included. Interventions which had modified the physical design of a care home or built a care home with an alternative model of residential aged care (including design alterations) in order to enhance the environment to promote independence and well‐being were included. Studies which examined quality of life or outcomes related to quality of life were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the abstracts identified in the search and the full texts of all retrieved studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias in each included study and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to GRADE criteria. Where possible, data were represented in forest plots and pooled. Twenty studies were included with 77,265 participants, although one large study included the majority of participants (n = 74,449). The main comparison was home‐like models of care incorporating changes to the scale of the building which limit the capacity of the living units to smaller numbers of residents and encourage the participation of residents with domestic activities and a person‐centred care approach, compared to traditional designs which may include larger‐scale buildings with a larger number of residents, hospital‐like features such as nurses' stations, traditional hierarchical organisational structures and design which prioritises safety. Six controlled before‐after studies compared the home‐like model and the traditional environment (75,074 participants), but one controlled before‐after study included 74,449 of the participants (estimated on weighting). It is uncertain whether home‐like models improve health‐related quality of life, behaviour, mood and depression, function or serious adverse effects compared to traditional designs because the certainty of the evidence is very low. The certainty of the evidence was downgraded from low‐certainty to very low‐certainty for all outcomes due to very serious concerns due to risk of bias, and also serious concerns due to imprecision for outcomes with more than 400 participants. One controlled before‐after study examined the effect of home‐like models on quality of life. The author stated "No statistically significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups." Three studies reported on global behaviour (N = 257). One study found little or no difference in global behaviour change at six months using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory where lower scores indicate fewer behavioural symptoms (mean difference (MD) ‐0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.13 to 0.04, n = 164)), and two additional studies (N = 93) examined global behaviour, but these were unsuitable for determining a summary effect estimate. Two controlled before‐after studies examined the effect of home‐like models of care compared to traditional design on depression. After 18 months, one study (n = 242) reported an increase in the rate of depressive symptoms (rate ratio 1.15 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.29)), but the effect of home‐like models of care on the probability of no depressive symptoms was uncertain (odds ratio 0.36(95% CI 0.12 to 1.07)). One study (n = 164) reported little or no difference in depressive symptoms at six months using the Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist where lower scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms (MD 0.01 (95% CI ‐0.12 to 0.14)). Four controlled before‐after studies examined function. One study (n = 242) reported little or no difference in function over 18 months using the Activities of Daily Living long‐form scale where lower scores indicate better function (MD ‐0.09 (95% CI ‐0.46 to 0.28)), and one study (n = 164) reported better function scores at six months using the Interview for the Deterioration of Daily Living activities in Dementia where lower scores indicate better function (MD ‐4.37 (95% CI ‐7.06 to ‐1.69)). Two additional studies measured function but could not be included in the quantitative analysis. One study examined serious adverse effects (physical restraints), and reported a slight reduction in the importa -Abstract Truncated-

Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map

Interventions addressing functional abilities of older people in rural and remote areas: a scoping review of available evidence based on WHO functional ability domains

The impact of transport, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility: A systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies

Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map

Specifying the content of home-based health behaviour change interventions for older people with frailty or at risk of frailty: an exploratory systematic review

Interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of older people living alone: a mixed-methods systematic review of effectiveness and accessibility

Interventions simultaneously promoting social participation and physical activity in community living older adults: A systematic review

2075 Systematic review of ‘Ageing well’ interventions to improve and maintain independent living for community housebound populations

1947 Process evaluation of a home-based intervention to promote independence among older people living with mild frailty

Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The Major Domains of Comprehensive Assessment Tools for Older Adults Requiring Home-Based Aged Care Services: A Systematic Review

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.

Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Effectiveness of smart living environments to support older adults to age in place in their community: an umbrella review protocol

Home and Community-Based Services: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map

Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF)

Using Smart Home Technologies to Promote Physical Activity Among the General and Aging Populations: Scoping Review

How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review

Supportive interventions for preparation for future care of community‐dwelling older adults: A scoping review

Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people.

Smart Home Technologies for Enhancing Independence of Living and Reducing Care Dependence in Older Adults: A Systematic Review