The influence of social identity on self-worth, commitment, and effort in school-based youth sport
Luc J. Martin,Danny Balderson,Michael Hawkins,Kathleen Wilson,Mark W. Bruner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1306091
IF: 3.9428
2017-03-18
Journal of Sports Sciences
Abstract:<p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table">The current study examined the influence of social identity for individual perceptions of self-worth, commitment, and effort in school-based youth athletes. Using a prospective research design, 303 athletes (<i>M<sub>age</sub> </i>= 14.89, SD<i> </i>= 1.77; 133 female) from 27 sport teams completed questionnaires at 2 time points (T1 – demographics, social identity; T2 – self-worth, commitment, effort) during an athletic season. Multilevel analyses indicated that at the individual level, the social identity dimension of in-group ties (IGT) predicted commitment (<i>b </i>= 0.12, <i>P</i><i> </i>= .006) and perceived effort (<i>b </i>= 0.14, <i>P</i><i> </i>= .008), whereas in-group affect (IGA) predicted commitment (<i>b </i>= 0.25, <i>P</i><i> </i>= .001) and self-worth (<i>b </i>= 2.62, <i>P</i><i> </i>= .006). At the team level, means for IGT predicted commitment (<i>b </i>= 0.31, <i>P</i><i> </i>< .001) and self-worth (<i>b </i>= 4.76, <i>P</i><i> </i>= .024). Overall, social identity accounted for variance at both levels, ranging from 4% (self-worth) to 15% (commitment). Identifying with a group to a greater extent was found to predict athlete perceptions of self-worth, commitment, and effort. More specifically, at the individual level, IGT predicted commitment and effort, and IGA predicted commitment and self-worth. At the team level, IGT predicted commitment and self-worth.</p>
sport sciences