Augmented and virtual reality in anatomy education: Can they be effective if they do not provide immersive experience?

Dimitrios Chytas,Marios Salmas,Georgios P. Skandalakis,Theodore G. Troupis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2119
2021-12-02
Anatomical Sciences Education
Abstract:It was our pleasure to read the systematic review and meta-analysis by Moro et al. (2021), who showed that the use of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in anatomy and physiology education did not lead to significant acquisition of knowledge in comparison with traditional two-dimensional (2D) methods. We consider that the findings are interesting and important, because other systematic reviews of anatomy education literature (Yammine and Violato, 2015; Triepels et al., 2020) showed that three-dimensional (3D) digital technologies were proven superior to 2D methods in terms of effectiveness. We would like to propose an alternative interpretation of the findings of the meta-analysis by Moro et al. (2021), taking into account the definitions which were provided for VR and AR and may cause confusion (Kurul et al., 2020; Chytas et al., 2021).
education, scientific disciplines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?