Staging systems for nasal and sinus disease

William H. Friedman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00020840-199602000-00003
1996-02-01
Abstract:Classification of nasal and sinus disease according to stage has been the subject of an ongoing study by me since 1987. During that time, the effectiveness of a staging system for chronic sinusitis has been a major factor in establishing treatment strategies, predicting prognoses related to various treatments, and assessing the outcomes of medical or surgical therapy for sinusitis. Several staging systems have emerged since 1990 that have been based exclusively on the computed tomography evaluation of chronic hyperplastic rhinosinusitis. In addition to the Friedman system, the Gliklich and Metson system, the Kennedy system, the Levine and May system, and the Lund and Mackay system have offered staging criteria for the evaluation of computed tomography scans in patients with sinusitis. All of these systems have much to recommend them. The adoption of a universal system would certainly simplify end results reporting and outcome assessment and is therefore both clinically and practically desirable. In this review, I attempt to discuss these systems and compare them with respect to stage, outcomes assessment, and rationale. Long-term outcomes assessment is only available in the Friedman system at this time. However, each system offers slightly different advantages and each is clear, comprehensive, and user friendly. Each is being evaluated by the Sinus Surgery Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?