Abstract:Arrow wrote his classic article in simpler times, as those who chance upon this article forty years hence will say of today. It was a new era in science and medicine, soon to be fueled by new resources from Medicare and the National Institutes of Health. Fiscal constraint was a stranger, physicians were in short supply, and information asymmetry was pervasive. In the intervening years, Americans have become more comfortable with health care issues. Fatal illness, which was rarely discussed with patients in 1960, is now researched by them on the Internet, and greater attention is paid to patient rights. Nonetheless, concerns about quality have, if anything, increased. Indeed, it is public concern about quality that has invited governmental regulation and induced a defensive posture among medical organizations, which are rushing to establish their own instruments of quality, and it is these same public concerns that have facilitated the ability of managed care to offer itself as the guarantor of quality. However, center stage is now held by another issue: health care costs. As a result, the focus has shifted from resolving information asymmetry by enhancing quality to controlling national health expenditures by changing the size and composition of the health care workforce. Licensure, which was restrictive in 1960, is more relaxed today, thereby reducing the entry barriers for the NPC disciplines, several of which were just beginning when Arrow wrote his article. The entry of NPCs into the realm of physician's services partially counterbalances the constraints that have been placed on physician supply, although the major contributions of NPCs are skewed to the primary care end of the spectrum while the major constraints on physician supply affect specialists. The growing presence of NPCs creates a dynamic market in which practitioners in various disciplines both compete and collaborate. It is, in fact, the perfect market that Arrow reluctantly longed for, in which providers who have different levels of skill offer their services at varying prices. But consumers have little upon which to base their choices. And while many of the services offered by NPCs replace physician services at a lower price, others represent additional services, which add to aggregate spending. Arrow sought to explain how a market replete with uncertainty could function. He saw that licensure, entry rationing, and educational subsidies could work to enhance quality, but they did so at the expense of the market. The market has seen it differently and has usurped these tools for its own purposes, leaving quality to look for other sponsors. Has it done so wisely? We have yet to see how well a multidisciplinary workforce of autonomous providers will function, but both successes and failures abound. What is more apparent is how entry rationing and restrictions on educational subsidies have capped the supply of physicians and limited the production of specialists at a time when there is increasing demand for their services. Arrow identified potent tools for affecting the characteristics of the health care workforce. They now must be redirected to the needs of the future.

Does the Geographic Distribution of Physicians Reflect Market Failure?: An Examination of the New Zealand Experience, 1981–87

Where have all the doctors gone? Changes in the geographic distribution of general practitioners in New Zealand since 1975 (3): New Zealand and foreign medical graduates compared

Geographical implications of restricting foreign medical immigration: a New Zealand case study, 1976-87

Foreign medical graduates and the doctor shortage in New Zealand, 1973-1979

Foreign medical graduates in New Zealand 1973-79: a test of the 'exacerbation hypothesis'

Rural practice and retention in New Zealand: an examination of New Zealand-trained and foreign-trained doctors

The Aotearoa New Zealand doctor shortage: current context and strategies for retention

Influence of Japan's 2004 postgraduate training on ophthalmologist location choice, supply and distribution

Variations in geographical distribution of foreign and domestically trained physicians in the United States: 'safety nets' or 'surplus exacerbation'?

Weighing the Evidence for Expanding Physician Supply

Population aging and physician maldistribution: A longitudinal study in Japan

Effective policy mechanisms for an equitable geographical distribution of general practitioners: a qualitative comparative analysis of the accessibility of primary care in Europe

The distance and chance of lifetime geographical movement of physicians in Japan: an analysis using the age-period-cohort model

Do adjustment costs constrain public healthcare providers' technical efficiency? Evidence from the New Zealand Public Healthcare System

Bringing the Doctor to the Patients: Cardiology Outreach to Rural Areas

Associations between education policies and the geographic disposition of family physicians: a retrospective observational study of McMaster University education data

Student debt amongst junior doctors in New Zealand; part 2: effects on intentions and workforce

Competition and supplier-induced demand in a health care system with fixed fees

Relative remoteness and wage differentials in the Canadian allied health professional workforce

Human inputs: the health care workforce and medical markets

Primary Care Physician Supply and Children's Health Care Use, Access, and Outcomes: Findings From Canada