Coronary microcirculation assessment using functional angiography: Development of a wire‐free method applicable to conventional coronary angiograms

Hernan Mejia‐Renteria,Joo Myung Lee,Ki‐Hong Choi,Seung‐Hun Lee,Lin Wang,Tsunekazu Kakuta,Bon‐Kwon Koo,Javier Escaned

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29863

IF: 2.3

2021-07-09

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract:ObjectivesWe aimed to develop a novel wire- and adenosine-free microcirculatory resistive index from functional angiography (angio-IMR) to estimate coronary microcirculatory resistance, and to investigate how this method can improve clinical interpretation of physiological stenosis assessment with quantitative flow ratio (QFR). BackgroundHyperemic index of coronary microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a widely used tool to assess microcirculatory dysfunction. However, the need of dedicated intracoronary wire and hyperemia limits its adoption in clinical practice. MethodsWe performed our study in two separate stages: (1) development of a formula (angio-IMR) to estimate IMR from resting angiograms and aortic pressure (Pa), and (2) validation of the method in a clinical population using invasively measured IMR as reference. Additionally, QFR diagnostic performance was assessed considering angio-IMR values. ResultsWe developed the formula: angio-IMR = (Pa–[0.1*Pa])*QFR*e-Tmn (where e-Tmn is an estimation of hyperaemic mean transit time) and validated it in 115 vessels (104 patients). Angio-IMR correlated well with IMR (Spearman's rho = 0.70, p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the curve of angio-IMR to predict IMR were 87.5% (73.2–95.8), 85.3% (75.3–92.4), 76.1% (64.5–84.8), 92.8% (84.9–96.7), 85% and 0.90 (0.83–0.95), respectively. False positive QFR measurements decreased from 19.5% to 8.5% when angio-IMR was incorporated into the QFR interpretation workflow. ConclusionsEstimation of IMR without physiology wire and adenosine is feasible. Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction causing high IMR can be ruled-out with high confidence in vessels with low angio-IMR. Awareness of angio-IMR contributes to a better clinical interpretation of functional stenosis assessment with QFR.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems