Abstract:Within the broader framework of the EU-H2020 EdiCitNet project—a large-scale collaborative project with a multi-stakeholder approach—there is the opportunity to observe participatory planning approaches to mainstream nature-based, edible solutions to solve specific social urban problems in an international group of six cities—Berlin (Germany), Carthage (Tunisia), Sant Feliu de Llobregat (Spain), Letchworth (United Kingdom), Šempeter pri Gorici (Slovenia), and Lomé (Togo). One year after the project started, the COVID-19 pandemic made it necessary to transfer most participatory planning processes to online platforms. This new format presented challenges to planning and voluntary stakeholder engagement due to different capacities regarding technical requirements as well as location-specific social circumstances. In this paper, we aim to shed light on the potentials and trade-offs in shifting to online participation and who gets to participate under digital Participatory Action Research (PAR) circumstances. We used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the planning progress and the transition to working online in the six cities during the first wave of the pandemic. The study identifies critical implications of COVID-19 on participatory planning processes, the challenges for online participation, and the effectiveness of measures applied to tackle those challenges. The transition to online participatory planning described in this paper emphasizes organizational rather than technical remedies. While the planning progress in all cities was delayed, some faced significant challenges in the transition to online due to the lack of technical or community capacities. This was fostered through the diverse and new realities of the stakeholders ranging from meeting existential needs to adapting to alternative forms of working and caring. The reflections in this paper offer learnings from the disruptions caused by COVID-19 to better understand how participatory planning processes can be managed online along the lines of equity, access, and participation. The findings demonstrate how participatory processes in the ongoing crisis can be maintained, with relevance to future waves of this and other pandemics.

Maintaining momentum for collaborative working groups in a post-pandemic world

Catalysing virtual collaboration: The experience of the remote TIES working groups

Navigating the post-pandemic terrain: lessons in resilience and adaptation

Remote Leadership and Work Engagement: A Critical Review and Future Directions

Work, Life and COVID-19: a Rapid Review and Practical Recommendations for the Post-Pandemic Workplace

“Part of Something Larger than Myself”: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary, Multicultural, and Multilingual International Research Team of Academic Women

Using Neuroscience-informed Group Work with Children and Adolescents Affected by the Pandemic

Enabling transformative economic change in the post‐2020 biodiversity agenda

"What We're Doing Now…Is More Than Water Cooler": Perspectives of Primary Care Leaders on Leading Through (and Beyond) COVID-19

Rising to the Challenge of COVID-19: Working on SARS-CoV-2 During the Pandemic

Ensuring a Post-COVID Economic Agenda Tackles Global Biodiversity Loss

Let's Do It Online?! Challenges and Lessons for Inclusive Virtual Participation

Productivity, pressure, and new perspectives: impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on marine early-career researchers

Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic

The influence of the global COVID‐19 pandemic on manuscript submissions and editor and reviewer performance at six ecology journals

Leveraging the strengths of a global network to adapt and sustain interprofessional education and collaborative practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic: local to global implications as perceived by urban ecologists

Fundamental Shifts in Research, Ethics and Peer Review in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Practices to Improve Teamwork in Software Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ethnographic Study

Mitigating losses: how scientific organisations can help address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early-career researchers

Collaborating in the Time of COVID-19: The Scope and Scale of Innovative Responses to a Global Pandemic